Home schooling hits new heights

Home schooling hits new heights

Article from: Herald Sun

Emily Power

July 13, 2009 12:00am

Rushworth family

Learning lounge: Chareen Rushworth home schools Timothy, Jane and Nathaniel, 4, in their family home. Picture: Mark Smith

HOME schooling is on the rise, with thousands of mums and dads rejecting mainstream education.

As 842,000 Victorian public students return to classrooms today, more than 2200 children will stay at home to be tutored by their parents.

In the past year an extra 715 students have started do-it-yourself education over public and private schools.

State Government records show 2279 students from 1257 families were registered as home schooled in June this year, up on the 1564 students from 859 families in June last year.

Bullying, philosophical beliefs, slow learners or bright pupils not being catered for, and some schools failing to deliver high standards, are driving the trend, according to home schooling expert Frank Marett.

Timothy Rushworth, 16, and his sister Jane, 14, have always been home schooled by their mother, Chareen.

Ms Rushworth said her family decided to home school because it did not make sense for her to return to work to pay school fees, and it had kept the family close.”I read a book called The Three Rs and I realised I had been teaching my children that when I taught them to count, and how to speak. I thought ‘I have got them to the age of five, I am sure I can teach them what one plus one is equal to’,” she said.

“And I realised it is not really as hard as it is made out to be.”

Frank and Valerie Marett home schooled their six children for 20 years. They now test home-schooled students and run a supply shop and advice service for parents.

“Parents require only one thing — self-discipline to stick at it. We are not the odd ones out, it is the schools,” Mr Marett said.

Psychologist and former teacher Sally-Anne McCormack said home schooling had its place but children must be socialised in preparation for tertiary studies or the workforce.

She recommends part-time home schooling for the most gifted students, but warned children should not be pulled out of the mainstream system because of bullying.

“We all need to learn resilience,” she said. “Change schools . . . find some professional help and support, and go back into the system.”

Education Department spokeswoman Jane Metlikovec said the department supported the right of parents to choose their child’s educational environment.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

The Rushworths used to live in New Zealand

We do not agree with Sally-Anne McCormack’s comments.

Homeschooling illegal in Sweden – facts of new suggested school law

Jonas says in an email below:

“We will need international support to show that Sweden, as a member of the international democratic community, cannot take such a position. As Sweden is often seen as the great social utopia of the world, it is important for Swedish homeschoolers to win this battle.”

As anyone who has read Jonas’ analysis of the proposed Swedish law can plainly see, the central government of Sweden thinks it knows all and knows best for all.  This is not just absurd, it is classic totalitarianism.  We in NZ have experienced this totalitarianism in the way the MPs, apart from ACT, decided they knew best over the consistently measured opposition to the Section 59 law change of 83%.

Ruby Harrold-Claesson, a lawyer from Sweden, came to New Zealand and told the authorities here what it would be like if we followed Sweden in banning smacking. We can see what she warned of happening already. Here  is a recent comment worth reading from Ruby: http://familyintegrity.org.nz/2009/anti-smacking-law-insult-to-tino-rangatiratanga/comment-page-1/#comment-1783.

Kiwis — we need to help Swedish home educators fight this proposed law, for if it happens in Sweden, it will establish a precedent for other socialist-tending-toward-totalitarian governmments, which includes NZ.  Sign the Swedish petition.  And vote No in the NZ refereundum.

If you have not already signed this petition then please do. http://rohus.nu/?English_information:Petition

Our freedoms to Home Educate our children in our own countries depend on us helping other countries such as SwedenGreat Britain and Germany at the moment.  Let us do all we can. Please sign the petition.

When you sign the petition you also need to confirm it though an email. If you have not done this then please do so now. You can check here invalid signatures list.


From: Jonas [mailto:jonas@rohus.nu]
Sent: Tuesday, 14 July 2009 6:29 a.m.
To: Craig and Barbara Smith
Subject: Homeschooling illegal in Sweden – facts of new suggested school law

Dear home schooling friends,

On June 15 the Swedish Government released its proposition for a new Swedish school law, which has been in the works for many years.

The position on homeschooling in the suggested law is a return to darkness. Homeschoolings will not be permitted for those refering to philosophical or religious reasons according to the European convention on Human Rights – i spite of the fact that the Convention is Swedish Law since 1994.

The reason given in the preparatory texts to the proposed law (indicating how the law should be interpreted) is (my translation):

“…that the education in school should be comprehensive and objective and thereby designed so that all pupils can participate, regardless of what religious or philosophical reasons the pupil or his or her care-takers may have.”

Thus, the suggested law argues:

“…there is no need for the law to offer the possibility of homeschooling because of religious or philosophical reasons in the family. All together this means that this suggested change cannot be said to contradict Swedens international obligations [Human rights conventions].”

The quotes above is from the preparatory text of the proposed law on page 584.

The actual proposed law reads like this:

Chapter 22 (my translation):

§18
A school-aged child can be allowed to fulfill the school obligation in other ways than what is stated in this law. Permission shall be given if…
1) the operation appears to be a fully satisfactory alternative to the education otherwise available to the child according to what is prescribed in this law.
2) insight into the operation [by the authorities] is provided, and
3) there are extraordinary circumstances

§19
Permission according to §18 can be given for up to one year at a time. During this time it shall be tried how the operation turns out. Permission shall immediately be withdrawn if it can be assumed that the prerequisites according to §18 no longer exits. A decision about withdrawal of permission takes effect immediately unless other decisions are made.

This actual proposed law is on page 187. The proposed law can be downloaded in Swedish from the Swedish Government homepage: http://www.regeringen.se/sb/d/11355/a/128290 (4.6 MB).

In the preparatory text, the possible acceptable “extraordinary circumstances” are: geographical difficulties, special medical care or a short term stay for foreign families in Sweden.

The law is now out for consideration and The Swedish Association for Home Education – http://www.rohus.nu/?English_information – has been officially asked to give its consideration to the Government – a small victory. The consideration period closes on October 1. The final law will be presented to Parliament during the spring of 2010 and will take effect in 2011.

The proposed law is the Swedish Government showing off its worst totalitarian socialist roots. Our contacts with our Government officials so far, show a lack of knowledge of contemporary home schooling and a complete lack of understanding of its human rights aspects. We will need international support to show that Sweden, as a member of the international democratic community, cannot take such a position. As Sweden is often seen as the great social utopia of the world, it is important for Swedish homeschoolers to win this battle.

Sensible international suggestions about the new Swedish school law can be sent toregistry@education.ministry.se

You are welcome to contact me at: jonas@rohus.se or the whole Rohus board atstyrelsen@rohus.nu

Please sign the English Rohus petition athttp://rohus.nu/?English_information:Petition . Don’t be shy, we have the resources to receive hundreds of thousands of signatures.

Best regards

Jonas Himmelstrand
Member and pedagogical advisor of the Rohus board

Read more comment here:

http://kiwipolemicist.wordpress.com/2009/07/13/sweden-wants-to-outlaw-homeschooling-done-for-religious-and-philosophical-reasons/

Support home educators (homeschoolers) in England

Support home educators (homeschoolers) in England
1034 Signatures
Published by Raquel Toney on Jul 07, 2009
Category: Civil Rights
Region: GLOBAL
Target: England
Background (Preamble):
Please help us keep our freedom to home educate as we, and our children, see fit.

Please support us in petitioning the Prime Minister of Great Britain to reject the recommendations of the Report to the Secretary of State on the Review of Elective Home Education in England by Graham Badman.This report is a totally disproportionate response to a ‘perceived’ problem full of unsubstantiated allegations that home educated children are more at risk of abuse than those at school. This simply is not true, as the report itself makes clear. Enacting the recommendations in this report would establish the state as “parent of first resort”, even though current legislation makes parents responsible for providing a suitable education for their children.

The report proposes to introduce monitoring and registration of home educators. Local officials would be given automatic access to private homes to interview children without their parents or any other trusted adult present. This is outrageous and a serious challenge to civil liberties. Registration may be refused or revoked on safeguarding grounds, though so far it is unclear what these grounds may be and Badman in his report stated that such grounds could be “any other concerns” that the local official had. Under such conditions, “registration” could really mean “permission” especially when home educators come up against inspectors who are anti-home education.

The proposals also introduce the need for the parent to submit an approved 12 month plan and for their child to “exhibit” at the end of the year that their plan has been successfully implemented. This will put an end to autonomous education/unschooling, as any such child-led philosophy would be decimated by having to implement such a structured scheme. This would also seriously curtail the flexibility that many structured home educators enjoy.

Across many countries there seems to be an attempt to undermine home education and to make sure that all children receive the state’s approved version of education, Sweden is moving to ban home education and it is already against the law in Germany.

Please help us stop this happening in England. This is becoming a global problem for home educators/homeschoolers. Let us unite and say with one big voice, “enough is enough!”

Petition:
We the undersigned call upon the Prime Minister of Great Britain to reject the recommendations of the Report to the Secretary of State on the Review of Elective Home Education in England by Graham Badman.

SIGN THE PETITION HERE – Click link below:

The Support home educators (homeschoolers) in England petition to England was written by Raquel Toney and is hosted free of charge at GoPetition.

For more information go to this blog:

http://aeuk.blogspot.com/

Family Integrity #462 — Dennis Morris-Traveller returns for 2nd interview on Youtube

Family Integrity #462 — Dennis Morris-Traveller returns for 2nd interview on Youtube.
You’ll love these interviews!

Craig Smith

Family Integrity

Greetings

Dennis Morris-Traveller of Baanaadoze, and spokesperson for the Yes Vote campaign re the upcoming referendum, returns for a second enlightening and entertaining interview with host Renton Maclachlan.

The topic is the much publicized ‘Ambiguity of the question’ – ‘Should a smack as part of good parental correction be a criminal offence in New Zealand?’

See at:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UdWFP-tIsfE

If you like it, tell others about it. Pass the link or this email on…

———————————————————————

The 1st Interview:

Dennis’s first  interview which teases out bullet points on the Yes Vote website Home page, can be found at:


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QfrwuBxc5w8

For some of the controversy generated by the first interview, see:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/dominion-post/communities/kapi-mana-news/2549421/Youtube-video-seen-as-desperate-Barnardos

http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PO0906/S00274.htm

———————————————————————

ALSO… two other informative videos on the referendum issue:

‘The NZ ‘anti-correction law’ – ‘What it says!’

|http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxiYobjbeO4

The aim is to remove any confusion people may have about the law. Clear, concise, and unemotional, it puts the issues plainly.

———————————————————————-

‘The NZ ‘anti-correction law’ – ‘Why correction is needed.’

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HsnT8ul2f28

Concise, fast paced, in your face yet unemotional. An analysis of the worldviews behind both the old and the new Section 59s.

Includes discussion of the ideas of Drs Brian Edwards, Lloyd Geering, Richard Dawkins, William Provine.

With thanks

Renton  Maclachlan