Diana Waring in Australia and New Zealand

This is Diana’s Proposed Itinerary (There may be some minor changes over the next few days or so) – more details to follow:

NEW ZEALAND:

Sept 8 – Arrive Christchurch, go to Akaroa – to get over jet lag
Sept 11 & 12 – Christchurch conference (Contact Linda)
Sept 14 – Travel to Palmerston North

Sept 15 – Palmerston North Conference (Contact Barbara barbara@hef.org.nz)  ‘International Freedom in Education Day’ website http://jipli.free.fr/
Sept 16 – Hastings workshop (contact Jenny)
Sept 17 – Travel to Auckland
Sept 18 & 19 – Auckland conference (Contact AHE – Beth)

Sept 20 – Rest
Sept 21 – Fly to Australia

AUSTRALIA:

Sept 21 – Fly to Australia
Sept 22 – Inverell, New England conference
Sept 25 & 26 – Sydney conference
Sept 27 – Drive to Hunter
Sept 28 – Maitland, Hunter conference

Oct 9 & 10 Brisbane Conference
Oct 11 – Fly to Melbourne
Oct 16 & 17 – Melbourne conference
Oct 19 & 20 – Adelaide conference
Oct 21 – Fly to Canberra
Oct 23 & 24 – Canberra conference
Oct 25 – Fly back to Seattle

For more details or to offer to help with the tour in your city/town then please contact:

New Zealand: Barbara barbara@hef.org.nz or hef.barbara@gmail.com

Australia: Bernie  meyersdb [at] tpg.com.au

“““““““““““““““““““““`

http://www.dianadownunder.com

““““““““““““““““““““““““““““`

Join us on
Facebook group
Dianadownunder

Letting infants watch TV can do more harm than good says wide-ranging international review

http://esciencenews.com/articles/2009/01/13/letting.infants.watch.tv.can.do.more.harm.good.says.wide.ranging.international.review

Published: Tuesday, January 13, 2009

A leading child expert is warning parents to limit the amount of television children watch before the age of two, after an extensive review published in the January issue of Acta Paediatrica showed that it can do more harm than good to their ongoing development. Professor Dimitri A Christakis, from the Seattle Children’s Research Institute and the University of Washington, USA, has also expressed considerable concerns about DVDs aimed at infants that claim to be beneficial, despite a lack of scientific evidence.

And he points out that France has already taken the matter so seriously that in summer 2008 the Government introduced tough new rules to protect the health and development of children under three from the adverse effects of TV.

Professor Christakis’ extensive review looked at 78 studies published over the last 25 years and reiterates the findings of numerous studies he has carried out with colleagues into this specialist area.

He points out that as many as nine in ten children under the age of two watch TV regularly, despite ongoing warnings, and some spend as much as 40 per cent of their waking hours in front of a TV.

“No studies to date have demonstrated benefits associated with early infant TV viewing” says Professor Christakis, whose review looked at the effect that TV has on children’s language, cognitive skills and attentional capacity, as well as areas for future research.

“The weight of existing evidence suggests the potential for harm and I believe that parents should exercise due caution in exposing infants to excessive media” he says.

“For example, the American Academy of Paediatrics discourages TV viewing in the first two years of life, but only six per cent of parents are aware of this advice despite ongoing publicity.”

Key findings of Professor Christakis’ review includes:

  • 29 per cent of parents who took part in a survey of 1,000 American families published in 2007 said they let their infants watch TV because they thought it was “good for their brains”. But claims made by manufacturers are not substantiated by peer-reviewed medical papers and industry studies.
  • Watching TV programmes or DVDs aimed at infants can actually delay language development, according to a number of studies. For example, a 2008 Thai study published in Acta Paediatrica found that if children under 12 months watched TV for more than two hours a day they were six times more likely to have delayed language skills. Another study found that children who watched baby DVDs between seven and 16 months knew fewer words than children who did not.
  • Infants as young as 14 months will imitate what they see on a TV screen, but they learn better from live presentations. For example, one study found that children learnt Mandarin Chinese better from a native speaker than they did from a video of the same speaker.
  • A study of 1,300 children conducted by the author and colleagues in 2004 found a modest association between TV viewing before the age of three and attentional problems at the age of seven, after a wide range of other factors were ruled out.
  • In another study, the author and colleagues looked at the effects of early TV viewing on cognitive development at school age. They found that children who had watched a lot of TV in their early years did not perform as well when they underwent tests to check their reading and memory skills.
  • More than one in five parents who took part in another study said that they got their infants to watch TV when they needed time to themselves. This, says the author, is an understandable and realistic need, but not one that should be actively promoted.

But why does television have such a negative effect on children of this age? “We believe that one reason is the fact that it exposes children to flashing lights, scene changes, quick edits and auditory cuts which may be over stimulating to developing brains” says Professor Christakis. “TV also replaces other more important and appropriate activities like playing or interacting with parents.”

There have been concerns about infants viewing TV for the last four decades but it has only been in recent years that studies have provided the empirical data to back up those concerns.

“The explosion in infant TV viewing and the potential risks associated with it raise several important policy implications” concludes Professor Christakis.

“First and foremost, the lack of regulation related to claims made by people promoting programmes and DVDs aimed at infants is problematic. Educational claims should, and can, be based on scientific data. Despite this, the names of the products and the testimonials they use often convince parents that TV viewing has a positive impact on their infants.

“Secondly, parents need to be better informed about what activities really do promote healthy development in young children. This may provide some defence against the aggressive marketing techniques being employed.

“Last, but not least, more resources need to be made available to fund critical research related to the effects of media on young children.”

Minister orders action on truants

http://www.stuff.co.nz/4831079a11.html

Minister orders action on truants

By LANE NICHOLS – The Dominion Post | Wednesday, 28 January 2009

Education Minister Anne Tolley says she is hugely frustrated by a decision to scrap the biennial school truancy survey last year, leaving data three years out of date.

The Government is demanding urgent action on truancy amid revelations that officials have little or no idea how many thousands of children cut class each day.

Education Minister Anne Tolley is instructing staff in her ministry to survey schools immediately to gauge national truancy rates and brief her on the fight against non-attendance.

Officials admit the latest national truancy figures up to 30,000 children each week are nearly three years old.

They could only guess how many children were absent on any given day, and had not delivered on reduced truancy targets, one said.

A biennial week-long survey of schools to collect crucial truancy figures, to have been held last year, was ditched while a new electronic attendance tracking system was implemented in some schools.

The last survey, in 2006, showed up to 30,000 children 4.1 per cent of the 750,000 primary and high school pupils were truant each week. It brought claims that the government was fighting a losing battle against a “truancy tidal wave”.

A further “lost tribe” of 2500 long-term truants are not even enrolled. They are thought to represent a hardcore of young offenders before the youth justice system.

The electronic tracking system will provide more accurate data, but problems have delayed its implementation. Only about 250 of the 2700 schools are believed to use it. Just a handful of schools took part in a trial of the new system late last year and the data was of little use, officials say.

“If that information had come out, we would have known what the attendance and non-attendance picture was,” a ministry official said. “So we share the disappointment. We feel it.”

The ditched survey was “the only information we have nationally on attendance. We have nothing else”.

Mrs Tolley said she was surprised and disappointed that Labour had not demanded last year’s truancy survey, which would have provided up-to-date non-attendance figures.

“This means the last solid data we have is from 2006. That is unacceptable and I will be directing officials to undertake a survey as soon as possible so we can understand the true size of the truancy problem and work with schools and communities to ensure that more children are regularly engaged in school.”

Getting more children back in class was a priority, especially when an estimated 150,000 pupils were failing.

Results from this year’s survey would not be available till 2010.

Labour education spokesman Chris Carter said “snapshot” surveys did not provide accurate truancy information as figures were easily skewed by one-off events.

He had not been responsible as minister for ditching the survey. “At no point was I asked about it. I assume it was advice from officials.”

The electronic system would eventually provide a much clearer picture. “We know there is a truancy problem. No one’s disputing that. But telling us how many kids are away isn’t solving the problem.”

Ministry senior manager Tina Cornelius said the electronic tracking system, which is not compulsory, was likely to replace the biennial survey, depending on schools’ uptake.

9th Annual Home Education Celebration 5 Feb 2009

Top up your family’s sense of belonging to the amazing homeschooling community!  For some, it’s the only opportunity to meet such a large and varied group of people in one go!  Join us at the …

9th Annual Home Education Celebration

Thursday 5 February 2009   11am to 2.00pm

Site 3, Long Bay Regional Park, Beach Rd, Auckland North Long Bay

This is the first time this event’s been held at Long Bay.  We can’t wait to see lots of you there who are excited about taking time out to be part of this growing event!  Families have travelled from Hamilton, Tauranga, Rotorua, Kumeu and even Whangarei before now so pass on the news – everyone’s welcome! Whether you’re home educating or still thinking about it, take this fab chance to kick off the year with others from around the region and beyond. Around 250-300 people are expected to unite and celebrate our exciting and rewarding lifestyle!

Put faces to names/voices, find support, share ideas, expand our families’ sense of belonging and have fun!  If you’re just dipping your toes (starting your journey or merely looking into the option), be bold and make sure you let someone know you need help!

BRING: a picnic, kids, partner, supporters, family (especially the sceptics!).  Enjoy the beach, a safe swim, sun and shade, nature trail, kite flying, safe ball game, boogie boarding – bring them along (not provided!).  Feel free to make a whole day of it. Remember those essentials: sunhats, sunscreen, togs, and water bottles, of course!

IMPORTANT: This beautiful area is an Auckland Regional Council Regional Park and marine reserve area.  There is no opportunity to fish, gather shellfish or bring the family dog.  Please take away your own rubbish when you leave.  For more information about the area and its history, visit www.arc.govt.nz/albany/main/parks/our-parks/parks-in-the-region/long-bay/

TRAVEL DIRECTIONS: Take State Highway 1 north and turn off at Oteha Valley Rd. Turn right and follow Oteha Valley Rd to the lights. Go straight ahead into Carlisle Rd and follow the signs through Torbay to Long Bay.

SITE LOCATION: Site 3 is booked for us.  Go through the main entrance to the park, continue towards the bus parking area. It’s on the right-hand side in front of the bus car park.  Facilities include car park (30m), beach (50m), toilets (20m), and drinking water (10m).

This event will only be cancelled if there are heavy rain/gale force winds.  Text or call Dawn on 027 435 8922 if unsure on the day.

If you lose this note, just take a second now to remember AHE’s website – http://www.ahe.org.nz – all the details will be there in the Calendar!

Organised by volunteers of Auckland Home Educators Inc, the region’s non-profit network and support group for current and prospective home educators.

Dawn Headley

Awareness & PR Coordinator

AUCKLAND HOME EDUCATORS INC – http://www.ahe.org.nz
networking across Auckland’s region and beyond for current & prospective home educators

Email:   PR@ahe.org.nz
Tel:      (09) 5277-922
Text:   027-435-8922

Diana Waring is coming Sept/Oct 2009

It is confirmed that Diana Waring will be coming to New Zealand and Australia   September and October 2009  (God Willing).  We will do all we can to avoid the Promise Keepers Conferences up and down the country. If you know of any other meetings that Home Educators would like to go to then please let us know so that we can work the programme around these as much as we can.

Diana’s website: http://www.dianawaring.com/

Email discussion groups: The best one and Diana is on this list:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/sharingdwaring/

and the NZ one that is very slow at the moment:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dwha/