Yearly Archives: 2010
Failing university students to get the boot
Failing university students to get the boot
The Dominion Post
Thousands of students could be booted out of university this year for
underperforming in a crackdown on those with poor marks.
Financially stressed universities have revealed they will significantly
increase the number of students who are shown the door, saying they only
want “motivated students”.
The automatic right of people aged over 20 to university courses could also
be under threat, as universities warn their budgets are at breaking point.
Massey University Vice-Chancellor Steve Maharey said universities had been
left with no choice.
“We will be excluding students who underperform. There will be a significant
number, there’s no doubt about that. We want to create space for motivated
students.”
Prospective students will also face a grilling, with universities making no
apologies for the tough stance.
“We have thousands who want to come here, but we will be carefully sifting
through the applications and some tough calls will be made. We will be very
careful about who we let come here. I expect all universities will be in the
same position.”
Canterbury University is also cracking down. It excluded 827 underperforming
students last year, compared with 203 in 2008.
The university’s academic quality assurance unit manager, Heather Dickie,
said a strict exclusion policy was necessary to keep standards high and
scrutiny of students was set to intensify this year.
The university has introduced a policy in which any student whose grade
point average is less than 1.5, or who has not passed half or more of their
courses will have their progress automatically reviewed. Grade point
averages are ranked up to nine.
Union of Students Associations’ co-president David Do said student groups
were already seeing an increase in exclusions for poor academic performance.
“They’re using the policy as a punitive tool to clear students off their
books due to constrained funding.”
Student associations were concerned that toughening up admission
requirements went against New Zealanders’ sense of fairness and their
sentiment that people should be given a “fair go”.
“Open entry is a very important feature of the education system. It’s a
cornerstone of our public tertiary education system.”
Mr Do said the Government needed to increase university funding.
Each university has a specific number of students funded by the Government.
They are allowed to take in more, but they are not funded.
Vice-chancellors’ concerns about underperforming students while funding is
capped has triggered a review of university entrance standards that will be
completed this year.
Ad Feedback
However, Tertiary Education Minister Anne Tolley has told the sector it
cannot expect funding to cover the increase in students.
In the Tertiary Education Strategy 2010-15, released last month, she
revealed that tertiary funding would be linked to performance, initially
focusing on students’ results.
Victoria University vice-chancellor Pat Walsh has also warned that
underfunding means the university will have more unfunded students this
year.
Last year the university had 650 unfunded students, which equated to a loss
of about $5 million.
New Zealand Vice-Chancellors’ Committee deputy chairman Roger Field, of
Lincoln University, said rather than kicking students out of university, his
preference was to let in only those who were likely to succeed. A “major
overhaul” of entrance standards was needed.
“University entrance standards don’t exactly assist us at this point, so if
we want to limit entry we have to apply particular standards for particular
programmes.”
– By NATHAN BEAUMONT, KIRAN CHUG and REBECCA TODD
http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/3216856/Failing-university-students-to-get-the-boot
Math Prodigy, 14, Invited to Cambridge
LONDON, Jan. 7, 2010
Math Prodigy, 14, Invited to Cambridge
Arran Fernandez Would be Youngest at University since 1773, When Eventual Prime Minister William Pitt the Younger Attended
In this photo released by the Fernandez family on Thursday, Jan. 7, 2010, home-schooled Arran Fernandez, 14, poses with the offer he received to join Fitzwilliam College at Cambridge University in October, in London. (AP Photo/PA, Neil Fernandez)
A 14-year-old math prodigy has been offered a place at Britain’s prestigious Cambridge University – if he can pass just one more exam.
Arran Fernandez, who was home-schooled in southern England’s Surrey county, was offered an undergraduate place at Cambridge’s Fitzwilliam College after passing the university’s entrance exam.
He now needs only to pass his physics A-level exam – a standardized test for British students – to enroll.
British media Thursday quoted the boy’s father, Neil Fernandez, as saying that Arran would be the youngest Cambridge undergraduate since William Pitt the Younger, who became prime minister, attended at the same age in 1773.
Cambridge University spokesmen were not available late Thursday.
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2010/01/07/world/main6069139.shtml
The Harms of Homeschooling? Where Are the Premises?
The Harms of Homeschooling?
Where Are the Premises?
by Brian D. Ray, Ph.D.
Context
Data-based research has consistently revealed favorable things related to the modern homeschool movement for about 25 years. Theoretical philosophical research, on the other hand, argues conflicting things about home-educating families and students. For example, professor Robin West recently published a controversial piece entitled “The Harms of Homeschooling”[1] that will be the main subject of this article. To set the stage for this discussion, a very brief summary of research on home education is important.
Repeated studies by many researchers and data provided by United States state departments of education show that home-educated students consistently score, on average, well above the public school average on standardized academic achievement tests.[2] To date, no research has found homeschool students to be doing worse, on average, than their counterparts in state-run schools.
Multiple studies by various researchers have found the home educated to be doing well in terms of their social, emotional, and psychological development.[3] Further, the limited research on the topic to date reveals that adults who were home educated are typically doing well on all measures considered, and they appear to be happy, on average, productive, and civically engaged members of their communities. No research has controverted these two general conclusions.
Finally, regarding empirical studies, this author is not aware of any research that has involved collected data and has shown that the practice of home-based education, homeschool parents, homeschool students, or adults who were home educated are harming, on average, one another, their neighbors, their communities, or their nations.
The purpose of this article is twofold, to show that the “harms of homeschooling” that West alleges basically have no foundation in research evidence and to note that West’s proposal for the state to control homeschool parents and their children is based on a worldview that it antithetical to one held by a significant portion of Americans.
Overview of West’s Article
West, in her piece, attempts to do two things. She begins by asserting that homeschooling that is not regulated more by the state is likely to harm children in several ways. She then moves on, from a particular but unspecified worldview, to propose government law and policies to control private homeschooling so that children and youth are less likely to be harmed. Her basic thesis and most of her ideas are not new. For example, Reich[4] has argued that the state must control home-based education to make sure that the students learn basic knowledge and skills, become psychologically autonomous, are not “ethically servile,” and become decent, civil, and respectful. Similarly, Yuracko[5] argued that the state must increase its control over home education to make sure children and youth are exposed to “liberal values” (p. 10) and to “… check rampant forms of sexism in homeschooling” (p. 11).
Seven Claims
Read the “seven claims” here: http://www.nheri.org/Latest/The-Harms-of-Homeschooling-Where-Are-the-Premises.html
Read what Brian Ray says about “West’s “Harms,” Solutions, and Worldview, and the Problem” here: http://www.nheri.org/Latest/The-Harms-of-Homeschooling-Where-Are-the-Premises.html
Read Brian Ray’s “Conclusions and Cautions” here: http://www.nheri.org/Latest/The-Harms-of-Homeschooling-Where-Are-the-Premises.html
Saturday School of Music
http://www.saturdaymusic.org.nz/
Saturday Music Palmerston North
Saturday Music aims to give children a musical foundation. It does this by offering affordable music lessons to childen aged from 4 to 12 years. Pupils are taught in small groups by talented music teachers.
Tuition for children aged 7 and up is offered in the following instruments:
Violin
Cello
Recorder
Flute
Fife
Guitar
Keyboard
Drums
Clarinet
Saxophone
Trumpet
Cornet
Trombone
For younger children, aged from 4 to 6, we offer a Music Basics course.
These fun, interactive classes provide a thorough grounding in the fundamental skills of music making, before children start more formal tuition on their chosen instrument.
Saturday Music provides a low cost, affordable option for music lessons, as the classes are subsidised by the Ministry of Education.
An instrument hire service is also available. The following instruments are available for hire: flutes, clarinets, violins (all sizes), cellos (all sizes), cornets, trumpets and trombones. Saxophones may be available. Junior flutes are provided for students enrolled in the combined Recorder/Junior Flute classes, and percussion instruments are provided for students enrolled in the Music Basics classes. Pupils are expected to provide their own recorders, keyboards, guitars and drumsticks with practice pad.
The enrolment form can be downloaded here: Saturday Music Enrolment form 2010
The prospectus can be downloaded here: Saturday Music 2010 Prospectus
The instrument hire form can be downloaded here: Saturday Music 2010 Instrument Hire