SONNY SCOTT: Home-schoolers threaten our cultural comfort

From:

http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=274594&pub=1&div=Opinion

SONNY SCOTT: Home-schoolers threaten our cultural comfort
6/8/2008 9:39:01 AM
Daily Journal

You see them at the grocery, or in a discount store.

It’s a big family by today’s standards – “just like stair steps,” as the old folks say. Freshly scrubbed boys with neatly trimmed hair and girls with braids, in clean but unfashionable clothes follow mom through the store as she fills her no-frills shopping list.

There’s no begging for gimcracks, no fretting, and no threats from mom. The older watch the younger, freeing mom to go peacefully about her task.

You are looking at some of the estimated 2 million children being home schooled in the U.S., and the number is growing. Their reputation for academic achievement has caused colleges to begin aggressively recruiting them. Savings to the taxpayers in instructional costs are conservatively estimated at $4 billion, and some place the figure as high as $9 billion. When you consider that these families pay taxes to support public schools, but demand nothing from them, it seems quite a deal for the public.

Home schooling parents are usually better educated than the norm, and are more likely to attend worship services. Their motives are many and varied. Some fear contagion from the anti-clericalism, coarse speech, suggestive behavior and hedonistic values that characterize secular schools. Others are concerned for their children’s safety. Some want their children to be challenged beyond the minimal competencies of the public schools. Concern for a theistic world view largely permeates the movement.

Indications are that home schooling is working well for the kids, and the parents are pleased with their choice, but the practice is coming under increasing suspicion, and even official attack, as in California.

Why do we hate (or at least distrust) these people so much?

Methinks American middle-class people are uncomfortable around the home schooled for the same reason the alcoholic is uneasy around the teetotaler.

Their very existence represents a rejection of our values, and an indictment of our lifestyles. Those families are willing to render unto Caesar the things that Caesar’s be, but they draw the line at their children. Those of us who have put our trust in the secular state (and effectively surrendered our children to it) recognize this act of defiance as a rejection of our values, and we reject them in return.

Just as the jealous Chaldeans schemed to bring the wrath of the king upon the Hebrew eunuchs, we are happy to sic the state’s bureaucrats on these “trouble makers.” Their implicit rejection of America’s most venerated idol, Materialism, (a.k.a. “Individualism”)

spurs us to heat the furnace and feed the lions.

Young families must make the decision: Will junior go to day care and day school, or will mom stay home and raise him? The rationalizations begin. “A family just can’t make it on one income.” (Our parents did.) “It just costs so much to raise a child nowadays.” (Yeah, if you buy brand-name clothing, pre-prepared food, join every club and activity, and spend half the cost of a house on the daughter’s wedding, it does.) And so, the decision is made. We give up the bulk of our waking hours with our children, as well as the formation of their minds, philosophies, and attitudes, to strangers. We compensate by getting a boat to take them to the river, a van to carry them to Little League, a 2,800-square-foot house, an ATV, a zero-turn Cub Cadet, and a fund to finance a brand-name college education. And most significantly, we claim “our right” to pursue a career for our own
“self-fulfillment.

Deep down, however, we know that our generation has eaten its seed corn. We lack the discipline and the vision to deny ourselves in the hope of something enduring and worthy for our posterity. We are tired from working extra jobs, and the looming depression threatens our 401k’s. Credit cards are nearly maxed, and it costs a $100 to fuel the Suburban. Now the kid is raising hell again, demanding the latest Play Station as his price for doing his school work . and there goes that modest young woman in the home-made dress with her four bright-eyed, well-behaved home-schooled children in tow. Wouldn’t you just love to wipe that serene look right off her smug face?

Is it any wonder we hate her so?

Sonny Scott a community columnist, lives on Sparta Road in Chickasaw County and his e-mail address is sonnyscott@yahoo.com.
Appeared originally in the Northeast Mississippi Daily Journal, 6/8/2008

–ends
http://www.djournal.com/pages/story.asp?ID=274594&pub=1&div=Opinion

Dudek’s go to Jail-What can we do?

From:

http://educatinggermany.7doves.com/2008/06/19/dudek-2

Dudek’s go to Jail

Its been splashed all over the papers in Germany, Mr and Mrs Dudek are going to jail for 3 months each, to be served consecutively so that their 7 children (the youngest is 1 year old) are not without care.They are being called hard and fast truants.

I simply do not understand!

Surely there are real truants that the State could go after? If they could keep track of them!

How can a free society incarcerate parents who are exercising their rights to love and care for their own children by educating them at home as the children have been since their birth?

Where will it all end?

How can a country suppress free thinkers (homeschoolers) and then revel in the innovations that other ‘free thinkers’ in science and technology, design and automation bring?

No doubt this family will need a lot of physical, financial, and emotional support and encouragement over the next 6 months. What will this separation do to the family dynamics? What has the State really done?

Lets face it, its hard enough for one at-home parent to survive until the end of the day (when the other usually comes home) with 1 or 2 children, let alone live this way for 3 months a piece.

Please do put pen to paper and do either of 2 things:

1 Write to the Dudeks in support

Familie Dudek
Freiderichstr No. 6
37293 Archfeld
Germany

2 Write to the officials in protest

[State Education Ministry]
Hessisches Kultusministerium
Mrs. Karin Wolff
Luisenplatz 10
65185 Wiesbaden
ministerin@hkm.hessen.de

[State Prosecutor]
Herwig Mueller
Staatsanwaltschaft
Frankfurter Str. 7
34117 Kassel
herwig.mueller@sta-kassel.justiz.hessen.de

[Education Authority Director]
LSAD Arno Meißner
Staatliches Schulamt für den Landkreis Hersfeld-Rotenburg
und den Werra-Meißner-Kreis
Rathausstraße 8
36179 Bebra

Tel: 06622/914-131
Fax: 06622/914-119
Arno.Meissner@hrwm.ssa.hessen.de

And to the German Ambassador in New Zealand:

Ambassador Jörg Zimmermann

Here

OR

Embassy of the Federal Republic of Germany
90-92 Hobson St
Thorndon
6011 Wellington
Tel.: +64 4 473 6063
Fax: +64 4 473 6069
German.Embassy@iconz.co.nz

Would be great if a number of us wrote to the Embassy here in New Zealand as well. Mention some positive things about your home educating experience and plead for the Dudek family and other home educating families in Germany.

More from 7doves

Anyone wanting to follow the situation with homeschoolers in Germany can bookmark http://educatinggermany.7doves.com

If at all possible I would still ask people to write to the authorities in this particular area about this particular case, as my experience writing to our rather removed German Embassy in New Zealand is that it has little clout (cc it by all means to them though).

‘Winning’ the right for parents to educate their children at home needs to happen on a State by State, case by case basis.

For those who read German the new German Homeschoolers Webring may be interesting http://7doves.com/_ringmaker.php

__._,_.___

Parents sent to jail for homeschooling

POLICE STATE, GERMANY
Parents sent to jail for homeschooling
‘Words escape me, it’s unconscionable, incredible, shocking,’ says attorneyBy Bob Unruh
© 2008 WorldNetDaily

A mother and father who have been homeschooling their children each have been ordered by a German judge to serve three-month prison terms after a prosecutor said he was unhappy with fines the family paid and he wanted the parents jailed.

The sentences for Juergen and Rosemarie Dudek were announced in Germany’s equivalent of a district court today in the state of Hesse, according to a staff attorney for the Home School Legal Defense Association. The group, the premier homeschooling advocacy organization in the world, has been monitoring and helping in the Dudeks’ case since before a federal prosecutor announced his intention more than a year ago to see the parents behind bars.

“Words escape me, it’s unconscionable, incredible, shocking,” HSLDA staff attorney Mike Donnelly told WND after he got word of the sentence. “They’ll appeal of course.”

He said the prosecutor’s agenda is clear, with the mindset: “You guys are rebelling against the state. We’re going to punish you.”

Donnelly said work was begun immediately to pursue an appeal through the court system in the German state.

He described the sentences as “breathtaking.”

It was just a year ago when WND reported the prosecutor, Herwig Muller, appealed a lower court’s imposition of fines against the Dudeks.

The prosecutor said at the time he would demand jail sentences of three months each for the parents. Muller also said he would not permit the case to be resolved with probation for the parents.

A newspaper reporter in Hesse, Harald Sagawe, said the parents previously paid fines because “they did not send their children to school, for religious reasons.”

He continued, “The parents, Christians who closely follow the Bible, teach their children themselves. Two years ago the court had also dealt with the Dudeks. That case, dealing with the payment of a fine, had been dropped.”

Judge Peter Hobbel, who imposed the fines, also criticized school officials for refusing to answer the family’s request for approval of their “private school.”

Arno Meissner, the chief of the government’s local education department, said he would enforce the mandatory school attendance law against the family, and he said he resented the judge’s interference.

“His duty is to make a judgment when the prosecutor brings a charge and to stay out of administrative matters,” Meissner said at the time.

The attitude is typical of some officials in Germany, where homeschooling has been stamped on since the Nazi era, critics say.

Practical Homeschool Magazine has noted one of the first acts by Hitler when he moved into power was to create the governmental Ministry of Education and give it control of all schools and school-related issues.

In 1937, the dictator said, “The youth of today is ever the people of tomorrow. For this reason we have set before ourselves the task of inoculating our youth with the spirit of this community of the people at a very early age, at an age when human beings are still unperverted and therefore unspoiled. This Reich stands, and it is building itself up for the future, upon its youth. And this new Reich will give its youth to no one, but will itself take youth and give to youth its own education and its own upbringing.”

Joerg Grosseleumern, a spokesman for the the Netzwork-Bildungsfreiheit, a German homeschool advocacy group, said in Hesse a family’s failure to follow the mandatory public school attendance laws violates not only administration regulations but the criminal code.

“It is embarrassing the German officials put parents into jail whose children are well educated and where the family is in good order,” he wrote in an earlier alert about the situation. “We personally know the Dudeks as such a family.”

Officials in Hesse have said not even the family’s efforts to move out of the region would halt their prosecution.

HSLDA officials estimate there are some 400 homeschool families in Germany, virtually all of them either forced into hiding or facing court actions.

Just weeks ago, WND reported the Dudeks warned about a new German federal law that also gives family courts the authority to take custody of children “as soon as there is a suspicion of child abuse,” which is how the nation’s courts have defined homeschooling.

“The new law is seen as a logical step in carving up family rights after a federal court had decided that homeschooling was an abuse of custody,” said the letter from Juergen Dudek to the HSLDA.

The letter said local “youth welfare” offices’ new authority includes “withdrawal of parental custody as one of the methods for punishing ‘uncooperative’ parents.”

Wolfgang Drautz, consul general for the Federal Republic of Germany, has commented on the issue on a blog, noting the government “has a legitimate interest in countering the rise of parallel societies that are based on religion.”

Drautz said schools teach socialization, and as WND reported, that is important, as evident in the government’s response when a German family in another case wrote objecting to police officers picking their child up at home and delivering him to a public school.

“The minister of education does not share your attitudes toward so-called homeschooling,” said a government letter in response. “… You complain about the forced school escort of primary school children by the responsible local police officers. … In order to avoid this in future, the education authority is in conversation with the affected family in order to look for possibilities to bring the religious convictions of the family into line with the unalterable school attendance requirement.”

In recent years Germany has established a reputation for cracking down on parents who object, for reasons ranging from religious to social, to the nation’s public school indoctrination of their children.

WND has reported several times on custody battles, children being taken into custody and families even fleeing Germany because of the situation.

One of the higher-profile cases on which WND has reported was that of a teen who was taken by police to the psychiatric ward because she was homeschooled.

The courts ruled it was appropriate for a judge to order police officers to take Melissa Busekros, 15 at the time, into custody in January 2007.

Officials later declined to re-arrest her after she turned 16. She was subject to different requirements and simply fled state custody and returned to her family.


Related special offers:Let everyone know your child is an honor student – at home!None Dare Call It Education

The Harsh Truth about Public Schools

You’ve Decided to Homeschool, Now What?

“Christianity and the American Commonwealth”

“The Marketing of Evil: How Radicals, Elitists, and Pseudo-Experts Sell Us Corruption Disguised as Freedom”

“Back Fired,” by William J. Federer, shows how the faith that gave birth to tolerance is no longer tolerated!

“The Little Book of Big Reasons to Homeschool”

California-Court Filings Complete

From: “Home School Legal Defense Association” <hslda@hslda.org>
Date: Thu, 22 May 2008 17:33:15 -0400
Subject: California–Court Filings Complete

============================================

From the HSLDA E-lert Service…
============================================

California–Court Filings Complete

Dear HSLDA Members and Friends,

On May 19 all the filings of the legal briefs to re-hear the case In
re Rachel L. were completed.

The Court of Appeal, which made the fateful decision on February 28,
2008 to declare all homeschooling illegal unless the parent is a
certified teacher, will now begin the process of considering the
arguments. The current schedule anticipates oral arguments to begin
this June.

HSLDA has been at the forefront of the process to defend the right to
homeschool in California and across the country. In this case, we
were able to successfully help Gary Kreep of the U.S. Justice
Foundation, who represents the father at the center of this case, Mr.
L., to prepare the arguments to grant the petition for re-hearing.
When the Court of Appeal granted the petition for rehearing, the
original opinion was vacated and no longer has any legal effect.

Furthermore, in the latest round of filings, we have also been able to
provide substantial assistance to the Alliance Defense Fund, which is
partnering with the U.S. Justice Foundation in order to make the
strongest argument possible to preserve homeschool freedom in
California. So much is at stake, and all parties involved have shared
their unique perspective to present the best case possible.

HSLDA has also filed a friend-of-the-court brief in conjunction with
Focus on the Family and Family Protection Ministries to show the
benefits of a home education. These arguments draw on the extensive
development of homeschooling and the successful track record of
parents educating their children at home.

Also, Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger has filed a brief
(http://gov.ca.gov/pdf/press/051908Brief.pdf) in conjunction with the
Attorney General of California, which supports a parent’s right to
homeschool. Their brief begins with this statement: “Recognizing that
home-schooling has a long and positive history in California and
across the nation, the State of California provides a broad statutory
framework that authorizes and regulates the practice.” In other
words, the Governor and Attorney General are strongly arguing for no
changes to the current law.

While we do not know what the court will decide, you can be confident
that hundreds of hours were spent by many different organizations to
defend your right to homeschool.

We hope and pray for a successful outcome in this case.

Sincerely,

J. Michael Smith
HSLDA President
The HSLDA E-lert Service is a service of:

Home School Legal Defense Association
P.O. Box 3000
Purcellville, Virginia 20134
Phone: (540) 338-5600
Fax: (540) 338-2733
Email: info@hslda.org
Web: http://www.hslda.org

““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““““`

The Governor has weighed in with an amicus curiae (friend of the court) brief, saying that existing California law gives three different ways that parents can legally home educate. He says the only reason to consider constitutional issues is if specific cases fall outside of those three avenues.

Nineteen members of Congress also filed an amicus brief in favor of home education rights. CHEA and the other two statewide support networks joined together in their own amicus brief.

And other groups, including HSLDA, have submitted amicus briefs.

In case you have not seen the good summary on the status in California from HSLDA’s perspective, I’m including it below.

Gov. Arnold: Let homeschooling continue
‘State provides a broad statutory basis for education by parents in California’
http://worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=64830

Homeschool Groups Submit Appeal to Court
http://mountainenterprise.com/atf.php?sid=2944&current_edition=2008-05-16

Will Smith Homeschooled his two children until they were 9 & 7

http://livesteez.com/news/news_detail/685#

Will Smith Pays $1M to Lease School For His Kids

 

 

Hollywood superstar Will Smith has taken hands-on parenting to a whole new level. The actor is reportedly investing more than $1 million in a new school near his California home. According to reports, Smith has paid $889,000 to lease the Indian Hills High School, after failing to find a suitable institute for his two young children – nine year-old Jaden and seven year-old Willow.

Until now the blockbuster actor and his wife, fellow actor Jada Pinkett Smith have been homeschooling the two children. The school, located in Calabasas, CA, has been renamed the New Village Academy of Calabasas

“Will is leasing the campus for three years, plus he’ll cover all costs such as utilities,” said a Smith family spokesman. “The academy will be run privately, and will include prekindergarten through grade six.”

Son Jaden starred opposite his famous father in the movie “The Pursuit of Happiness.” Willow, for her part, made an appearance in Smith’s blockbuster hit “I Am Legend.”