Baptism

Baptism

Posted in Theologically Speaking

I once asked some good Christian friends how they, as rational, intelligent people, could go along with this crazy idea some people have of baptising or sprinkling infants. They laughed in such a way as to indicate that I wasn’t the first person to ask such a question. They didn’t answer but simply gave me a slim book to read, William the Baptist, by James M. Chaney who wrote it back in 1877!

It was a great little human interest story, a bit of a romance really, describing the doctrinal worries of a Baptist gentleman as he courted his Presbyterian sweetheart. I couldn’t put it down.

When I did, I cannot say I understood the doctrine of infant baptism. But I could see that it wasn’t the obvious open-and-shut case I had thought it was. A fair bit of further study followed, and by borrowing some comparative diagrams from some authors and working them over myself, I came up with the table  (ie. set of comparisons) below, which I trust is reasonably accurate as I tried to soften the dogmatism in the originals. This only barely begins to explain the difference between the two main positions within the Protestant camp. What seemed more important or significant was that this doctrine, like most others, cannot be considered in isolation, but is inextricably entwined within the wider range of doctrines, the whole of which makes up one’s theology.

In other words, we must be slow to speak ill of another’s theology unless we are familiar with the bigger picture. If we as home schooling parents disparage another denomination, we have already transgressed and set a bad example as well. I know how easy it is to do….I have had to make two public apologies for just such offences within the last five days. Ripping into others’ ideas on baptism, for example, mainly because they don’t match your own, breeds the ugly bigotry we Christians are always being accused of displaying. Note the two areas of total agreement below: #1 and #12. Symbolism is not an exact field of study but very subjective. And none of us can possibly know the state of a person’s heart. Therefore we must learn to show patience, long-suffering, mercy and compassion to others, just as our Lord has shown to us. Even though it may be obvious to us that the other guy doesn’t have it all together,  remember  …neither do we.

Believer’s Baptism (BB) — Infant Baptism (IB)

1. BB is symbolic only and causes no change in the one being baptised.

IB is symbolic only and causes no change in the one being baptised.

2. BB signifies a believer has turned to the Lord.

IB signifies a child has been set apart to the Lord.

3. BB is done on a profession of faith by the one being baptised.

IB is done on a declaration by the parents of the one being baptised that they will rear that one in the Christian faith.

4. BB demonstrates a sharp discontinuity between the OT and the NT: believer’s baptism is unlike anything which had gone before in the same way that being born again as a Christian is unlike anything which had gone before.

IB demonstrates a close continuity from the OT into the NT: bringing infants of believing families into the covenant community of God’s people is continued, although the accompanying rite of circumcision is changed to the bloodless rite of water baptism.

5. BB portrays the death, burial and resurrection of Christ.

IB portrays a setting apart, being sanctified, made holy.

6. BB – the believer is identifying self with the death, burial and resurrection of Christ, promising to live hereafter for Him.

IB – the parents acknowledge that God has total claim to the child’s life but also claim God’s promise to bless the children of faithful believers.

7. BB – water symbolises cleansing from sin.

IB – water symbolises cleansing from sin via the Holy Spirit coming down upon (pouring or sprinkling).

8. BB indicates that God works with individuals.

IB indicates that God works with individuals through the context of families.

9BB is a badge of membership in the Body of Christ. 

IB is a mark of ownership by God.

10BB confirms that the believer has accepted Christ as Lord and Saviour.

IB confirms that God has accepted the child into His covenant family by virtue of confessing parents.

11. BB centres upon man’s believing.

IB centres upon God’s fulfilling His promise.

12. BB – sometimes the one baptised appears to be unregenerate after all.

IB – sometimes the one baptised appears to be unregenerate after all.

From Keystone Magazine
March 1998 , Vol. IV No.1
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig
@hef.org.nz

How can you stick it? All day everyday with the kids at home?? Aaaarrrggghhh!!

How can you stick it? All day everyday with the kids at home?? Aaaarrrggghhh!!

Posted in Tough Questions

How can you stick it? All day everyday with the kids at home?? Aaaarrrggghhh!!

We want the thrill of participating in our children’s learning process. All parents remember how much pleasure there is in watching for, coaching, developing and announcing each child’s first smile, first step, first word, first go on a bike, etc., etc. We get that thrill over and over as they learn to read, to write, to master maths, to put a science project together, or to see relationships in history. We also have the added bonus of knowing that they have learned and mastered that particular skill and not simply “experienced” it. The extra added bonus is that we have learned it afresh ourselves.

In fact, we find this home schooling so stimulating we actually get hooked on it. We would rather see the children learn than earn money. But then we see all activities as learning activities, earning money included. We have sought and found ways for the children to help us earn our income: assisting us who are self-employed by doing unpaid chores around the house for us, freeing us up for the paid work; directly helping us in running our home business; developing their own cottage industries, earning their own pocket money; several pairs of eyes and ears are better than one in locating bargains around town. The emphasis in all this is not on teaching as it is in the schools, but on learning. The children will learn virtually automatically when they can accompany and participate to even a small degree in some common everyday activity like pulling the weeds, shopping, changing a tyre, repairing the back fence, banking, posting…..the list, like the tasks to be done, is endless!

But children learn by helping you do the tasks. This is killing two birds with one stone: teaching the kids while doing all those chores and errands at the same time. They not only learn about the myriad mundane tasks that make up a day in the real world, but also come to see the place each task plays in the overall picture. In other words, they form a world-view based on the reality of your life in the home, the community and the market place rather than some Marxist/feminist academic’s spin-doctored theory about reality as he/she sees it from his/her ivory tower. Children learn local geography, economics, maths, time management, manual skills and more just by doing what you do during the day. It may take you longer to get through your list of chores, but because you are trying to look at these tasks through the eyes of your children, you will see these tasks in a totally new perspective. It will revitalise your own “boring” and “routine” day in a way you would never imagine to be possible.

We haven’t found home schooling to be expensive. I mean, even at “free” public schools the parents are continually shelling out for uniforms, books, fees, field trips, etc. “Free” public schools are also very time consuming and stressful for the concerned parent. There are all those delicate relationships with all those teachers and administrators, the other parents at PTA meetings, the tense debates at the school committee meetings, and the continual fund raising activities. And of course there is the transportation here, there and everywhere. Home schooling also takes time, but it is not time spent, it is time invested! And again, maybe as little as two hours a day is formal instruction, the rest is instruction “on the job” as you go about your necessary routine.

I believe the main reason that sympathetic friends do not themselves home school is because they do not want themselves or their children to be different. Sure, they want them to be better than average and distinctive in many ways, but not really different. But we do not want our children to be the same as all the others around, so that’s why we home school. We don’t want ours to be as cheeky, disrespectful, dishonest, disobedient and destructive as so many kids are today. We don’t want our children trained to be pleasure-seeking hedonists. We don’t want our kids to be so group-oriented that they cannot think, reason, evaluate, decide and then personally commit themselves to a course of action without the consent of their peers.

We are doing the best we can, I repeat, the best we know we can do, to maintain religious and civil freedoms in NZ by home schooling our children. The world-wide trend seems to be toward centralisation in government and ecumenicalism in religion. We aim to train up Biblically individualistic, independent thinkers, who are unafraid to shoulder responsibilities, but who are afraid of sin, who will, by God’s grace, evaluate all things by the principles set forth in the Bible. By so doing we will have produced children who will not be so easily pushed around by Big Brother, nor will the world be very successful at intimidating them to conform to its mould. We are not trying to produce anarchists. By training our children to be thoroughly Biblical in thought, word and deed, our children will be thereby effectively restrained from fulfilling their selfish desires and at the same time constrained to do that which is right.

We are doing the best thing possible to help the public, the private and the Christian schools…..providing them with some stiff competition. And I mean stiff. An average home with average access to resources with average parents with no special training are routinely producing children with top academic and social skills, while schools with masses of money and mountains of resources and highly trained and paid professional teachers, counsellors and administrators are having mixed results. Virtually any parent with only a half-measure of concern for excellence in their children’s education can easily raise up a family of superior academic and social accomplishments. Impossible, you say. Only natural, I retort. A home schooling parent is a private tutor. With only two hours of quality one-to-one tuition a day an average parent will certainly accomplish far more than all but the most exceptional teacher, contending with 30-40 mixed ability children in a classroom, can accomplish in a whole week….or longer. Almost every teacher will grant you that. And on top of that, who but you, the parent, is more concerned and motivated toward your children’s success? Who knows and understands your children better than you? You know when they are truly having an off day and when they are just having you on. Who else but you can ensure they get the morals, values and world outlook that you want them to have? I am sure you have heard the old saying, “If you want something done right, you’ve got to do it yourself.” This holds just as true in the realm of education as anywhere else.

It is a shame that the state educationalists are today perceived as the “professionals”, the “experts”, as if they alone held the keys for unlocking the child’s abilities to learn and for unlocking the mysteries of God’s creation that it may be understood. There is an exceedingly strong argument which can demonstrate that humanistically-trained state teachers do more to thwart children’s learning abilities than to unlock them. The fact that these same teachers are bound by law to teach from a secular or God-less perspective guarantees that they will not unlock the mysteries of God’s creation or ever properly understand them. I believe every parent must no longer allow herself to be intimidated, disparaged, patronised or put down by anyone within the state education system.

Instead of belittling her own abilities, I believe every parent must first of all seriously consider teaching her own children at home because in most cases she can do a superior job of it. If that is indeed totally out of the question, parents should then consider the Christian school, giving thanks and praise to God that there are so many dedicated Christian teachers and administrators with the vision for Christian schools.

The state schools are there as a last resort. That was partly why they were established — to provide and ensure a minimum of education to all NZ children. Yet  I know of no parents who consciously say they want the minimum education being offered by the state. Parents desire more, much more. Therefore they owe it to themselves to seriously consider the home schooling option.

From Keystone Magazine
March 1998 , Vol. IV No.1
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig
@hef.org.nz

Stick to Your Guns….And Keep Firing !

Home Schoolers Did It
Stick to Your Guns….And Keep Firing !
by Genevieve Smith
(Back in mid-1994, home schooler Genevieve Smith of Palmerston North, NZ, then 14, began publishing a newsletter called The Minority. The purpose was to mobilise home schooling minors into appropriate political action. Recently she wrote this account of those days.)
After publishing the first issue of The Minority I thought I would take it along to my local youth group and give copies of it to those in my Bible Study Class.
They were impressed with the newsletter but were not so sure that they could write letters to the Editor after I spoke to them of the need to fight for our beliefs. Soon the subject of smacking came up and how it was soon going to be made illegal to smack children. One girl asked if there was a letter that they could all sign in support of smacking. I volunteered to write a letter that they could all sign and then send it to two local papers and Dianne Yates (MP who wanted to ban smacking).

It was published and Dianne Yates wrote back. Her letter moved one of my friends to write back because “Dianne Yates’ thinking was off track.” Within days of our letter appearing in the paper someone wrote a reply to it.
My friends at the Youth Group were appalled. They thought that our writing a letter had been a waste of time because we had had opposition.
It was actually quite the opposite. Our letter had stirred people up. It had made them act.
Here we were, an apparently insignificant minority, moving a generation twice our age to thinking again about a very important matter. We had started a debate. So I wrote another letter and got my friends to sign it.
This time I met with opposition. One girl said that she didn’t like her friends seeing her name in the newspaper. Others said that they agreed with the letter but didn’t want to make trouble.
Even so I still got a lot of people to sign it. After the publication of this letter, Natasha received a private letter from a lady in her church. The lady, I believe, was not too impressed with the way Natasha was pushing her beliefs because, after all, we Christians are not supposed to get involved in the problems of the world. This is a very wrong way to view the world and its problems.
My father always used to say that there are three types of people in this world: Those who make things happen, those who watch things happen, and those who say “What happened?”
As Christians we should be in the first group; we should make things happen and not wait for the non-Christians to take over.
The world is the Lord’s and He has given us laws to govern it by. In New Zealand at this period of time a lot of non-Christians are doing all they can politically or otherwise to change New Zealand into a completely secular (with no reference to God or the Bible) country. It is our job as Bible believing Christians, to stop this. How? Write. The pen is mightier than the sword, and when a whole body of people (even a minority) rise up in unison over a matter things start to happen!
Wheels start to turn and resolutions are made. Show that you won’t be made to back down over a matter. Write to your local newspaper, MP, or organisation.
And remember: always glorify God in everything you do.
Dianne Yates wrote:
1 — Legislation may help in one way to eliminate some of the violence in our society.
2 — Violence begets violence.
Genevieve responded:
1 — Legislation to rule out smacking will not do anything except to make a lot of new law breakers out of otherwise peace-keeping individuals. Outlawing alcohol in the “Roaring Twenties” did not stop people drinking. It simply pushed it underground.
2 — Here Dianne Yates is equating smacking with violence. However, smacking and violence are two very different things. Smacking is controlled justice and Biblical.

Keystone March 1998

Vol IV No 1

4 Tawa Street

Palmerston North

craig@hef.org.nz

https://hef.org.nz/category/keystone-magazine/