This National government would be well advised and warned to examine carefully the agendas of those who have promoted, lobbied for and recommended the actions in this bill in order to maintain peace, good relations, civility and lawful behaviour in our communities

29 October 2012

 

Social Services Select Committee

 

Submission on – Social Security (Benefit Categories and Work Focus) Amendment Bill 67-1 

 

I ……………………………… oppose the proposed Social Security(Benefit Categories and Work Focus) Amendment Bill for the following reasons,

 

1. Contravention of the Care of children act 2004

 

2. Courts will be required to appoint a lawyer for the child where CYFS involvement becomes a problem for parents, if not before CYFS involvement, at further cost to the tax payer.

 

3. This bill will effectively Place greater numbers of children at risk from sexual predators, and other dangers presented by leaving or removing them from the safety of the family home environment and placing them in a public arena.

 

4. Concerns of costs of administering and paying approved ECE organisations.

 

5. Costs of additional unnecessary Wellchild/Tamariki Ora checks where children have no health issues.

 

6. Concerns of favouritism, cronyism or nepotism influencing democratic processes.

 

7. Concerns of cost of policing ECE and medical programs that would be ongoing for many years in the majority of cases and would also require increased costs in CYFS resourcing almost certain to outweigh any perceived short term gains.

 

8. Recent New Zealand studies have shown that early childhood education cannot provide learning at a level as high as is possible in the home.

 

9. Claims that intensive quality early childhood education is vital for children’s later success are not held up by the latest reports from the NZ Competent Learners Study carried out by NZCER and the  Ministry of Education.

 

Read More: http://www.childforum.com/news-early-childhood-education-latest/459-competent-learners-study-shows-ece-doesnt-have-significant-long-term-benefit-for-nz-kids.html#ixzz2AajS36We

 

10. A 50% reduction of income will create an extreme violation of human rights which will place children and their families at risk of starvation and would create situations where basic health needs of shelter and warmth cannot be financially met.

 

11.Given that each and every vaccination carries risk factors not only from DNA but also from method of construction and additives, parents must be afforded an informed choice of whether to vaccinate or not to vaccinate as a matter of their own decision. Parents must be fairly informed that the human body’s’ primary natural defenses are being ignored and bypassed by injecting foreign materials directly into the bloodstream,  sometimes live sometimes dead DNA of known pathogens and any number of the following sources of foreign DNA, additives and adjuvants, aluminum hydroxide, aluminum phosphate, ammonium sulfate, amphotericin B, animal tissues: pig blood, horse blood, rabbit brain, dog kidney, monkey kidney, chick embryo, chicken egg, duck egg, calf (bovine) serum, betapropiolactone, fetal bovine serum, formaldehyde, formalin, gelatin, glycerol, human diploid cells (originating from human aborted fetal tissue )hydrolized gelatin, mercury thimerosol (thimerosal, Merthiolate(r)), monosodium glutamate (MSG), neomycin, neomycin sulfate, phenol red indicator, phenoxyethanol, potassium diphosphate, potassium monophosphate, polymyxin B, polysorbate 20, polysorbate 80, porcine (pig) pancreatic hydrolysate of casein, residual MRC5 proteins, sorbitol, tri(n)butylphosphate, VERO cells, a continuous line of monkey kidney cells, and washed sheep red blood cells, human fetal tissue.

 

12. In order to ensure safety of their children for those who are coerced by means of financial deprivation and as a consequence agree to subject their children to vaccination processes it would be remiss of a government to not ask for greater transparency, accountability and liability from  manufacturers, agents, government representatives, advisory boards, General practitioners and medical staff who would seek to administer vaccinations, in the form of signed warranties of vaccine safety and legal waiver of any statutory, Common Law, Constitutional, UCC, international treaty, and any other legal immunities from liability lawsuits in the instant case, in order to ensure that these children are never subjected to “human experimentation” abuse on the part of pharmaceutical companies, those with vested interests, those making a profit from sales attempting to claim false efficacy in order to acquire greater profit or “cut costs” or meet delivery expectations without complete safety data being provided or adequate safety protocols being carried out or following agendas other than the purpose of health and safety of children they propose to subject to vaccination.

 

13. “Whereas it is essential, if man is not to be compelled to have recourse, as a last resort, to rebellion against tyranny and oppression, that human rights should be protected by the rule of law”

 

14. Human rights violation issues;

UN Human Rights Agreement;

Article 1.

    All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

Article 4.

    No one shall be held in slavery or servitude; slavery and the slave trade shall be prohibited in all their forms.

Article 5.

    No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.

Article 7.

    All are equal before the law and are entitled without any discrimination to equal protection of the law. All are entitled to equal protection against any discrimination in violation of this Declaration and against any incitement to such discrimination.

Article 12.

    No one shall be subjected to arbitrary interference with his privacy, family, home or correspondence, nor to attacks upon his honour and reputation. Everyone has the right to the protection of the law against such interference or attacks.

Article 16.

 (3) The family is the natural and fundamental group unit of society and is entitled to protection by society and the State.

Article 17.

 (2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

Article 20.

 (2) No one may be compelled to belong to an association.

Article 22.

    Everyone, as a member of society, has the right to social security and is entitled to realization, through national effort and international co-operation and in accordance with the organization and resources of each State, of the economic, social and cultural rights indispensable for his dignity and the free development of his personality.

Article 23.

    (1) Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favourable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.

Article 25.

    (1) Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.

    (2) Motherhood and childhood are entitled to special care and assistance. All children, whether born in or out of wedlock, shall enjoy the same social protection.

Article 26.

 (3) Parents have a prior right to choose the kind of education that shall be given to their children.

Article 29.

    (1) Everyone has duties to the community in which alone the free and full development of his personality is possible.

    (2) In the exercise of his rights and freedoms, everyone shall be subject only to such limitations as are determined by law solely for the purpose of securing due recognition and respect for the rights and freedoms of others and of meeting the just requirements of morality, public order and the general welfare in a democratic society.

    (3) These rights and freedoms may in no case be exercised contrary to the purposes and principles of the United Nations.

Article 30.

    Nothing in this Declaration may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any right to engage in any activity or to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.

 

 

 

I am of the opinion that the Social Security (Benefit Categories and Work Focus) Amendment Bill will be vehemently opposed, it is almost guaranteed there would be civil unrest and civil disobedience and a degree of lawlessness as a result should this bill come to pass. There would be a concerted effort to oppose both forced ECE and compulsory vaccination by way of law and by whatever other means may be possible.

 

15. This National government would be well advised and warned to examine carefully the  agendas of those who have promoted, lobbied for and recommended the actions in this bill in order to maintain peace, good relations, civility and lawful behaviour in our communities.

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *