The Excellence of Home Education

It is time to remember…

The Excellence of Home Education

by Craig Smith
“The homeschool parent who assumes the role of tutor
is providing the best known, longest-tested approach
known to educational history. That is the reason
homeschool children are now welcomed at every
university in the land. Homeschooling produces young
men and women who are literate in the best sense, well
mannered, normal and self-confident. The myth is that
they miss the benefits of “socialization” and
“democracy” in unsafe schools with prejudiced
teachers, unruly crowds and biased lessons. In
contemporary America nobody can escape rubbing
elbows with every race, every ethnic background and
every level of citizen. It is best to have this experience
when one is equipped to discern the difference between
ability and pretense, morality and stupidity,
propinquity and friendship. And when one can defend
what one knows and believes. It is, after all, crucial to
understand and respect differences, but first one must
establish one’s own identity. Education is slow;
socialization is quick.”1
Otto Scott is here using the term “socialization” in its
most exact and precise meaning: being integrated into
the officially sanctioned, officially recognised and
officially supported group. State schools exist to
socialise education in the same way hospitals are there
(in New Zealand at least) to socialise medicine by
bringing it all together into one group under state
control. State schools exist to socialise children’s
character and personality development in the same
way the Ministry of Social Development is there to
socialise community support services by bringing them
together in one large, centrally organised group under
state administration and financed by the state. That is,
the concern about “socialization” in relation to home
education technically means how can we “rebels” dare
to keep the educational, character and personality
development of our children to ourselves where
they’ll be separate from the official group,
different from everyone else? How dare we
deny that our children do not belong to the state,
that we deny the socialist state the opportunity
to inculcate the concepts and experiences of
socialism the state schools provide?
For so many of us, having seen the official state
school version of child socialisation generally
either running riot in the streets or more often
following mindlessly behind the one in front, we relish
the opportunity to develop something more exciting
and varied and service-oriented in our own children.
We tend to dismiss the query about the “socialisation”
of our home educated children as a total non-issue.
But you know, the way the term “socialisation” is used
by most people, it is important. They wonder if our
children’s personalities and characters will be able to
cope with meeting and interacting in a civil way with
others. Most people naturally and automatically
recognise that personality and character development
are definitely more important than academic
education. That’s why it is usually the first question on
their lips.
President Teddy Roosevelt

And that’s because character and personality
development definitely are more important than
academics. I believe it was President Teddy Roosevelt
who said, “If you train a man in mind but not in
morals, you have trained a menace to society.”
Without proper training in morals and values –
unchanging, non-negotiable standards of right and
wrong – then the creature you drill in academic
acumen will be no more than an educated barbarian.
This is especially true if you do as is done so often in
state schools today: run a “values” programme that
ultimately says values are determined pragmatically by
the group: rape, murder and theft are socially and
democratically determined to be undesirable for it is
not how you’d like others to treat you, and in the
exercise of your rights and freedoms you must be
careful not to infringe upon the rights and freedoms of
others.
This is diabolical, straight from the lair of the evil one.
You see, if there are no ultimate standards of right and
wrong for which each and every one of us will be
judged when God wraps it all up on Judgment Day,
then if I can get away with things, I win. If pillage and
murder cause chaos and grief to others, what is that to
me if I profit from the pillage and murder by
increasing my property and reducing my competition
and/or adversaries? If these evils are not ultimately,
unchangeably and always wrong, and if I am not going
to suffer for committing them unless I get caught…
well, I am arrogant enough to reckon I can easily get
away without being caught. And because I stand to
gain so much easy wealth and/or perverted pleasure, it
is worth the gamble. In fact since getting caught means
I’ll suddenly have the most expensive 24-hour-a-day
security looking after my physical protection, free
housing, clothing and food as well as access to
education and entertainment for only a few years
before being back out in society, the gamble starts to
take on a compelling and tempting logic. If
you add to this the typical evolutionary
philosophy that there is no meaning to life
and existence apart from whatever meaning
you care to impose upon it, then existence in
society as part of a traditional family; as part
of a hedonistic, drug-soaked gang; or as a
maximum-security prisoner all hold the same
ultimate value and worth: nil, apart from
whatever value or purpose I assign to it.
We see from the breakdown of discipline in schools,
youth crime and suicide rates, rising crime and divorce
and drug and alcohol abuse that more and more folks
are coming to precisely this conclusion.
Not so Christian home educators. We do not see life as
circular or cyclic, like the buzzard circling over
roadkill or the flow of sewage down the tubes. Life is
linear, starting with God creating it all in Genesis
Chapter one; progressing through our personal
conceptions and births; being born anew by God’s
Spirit at conversion; being set upon the straight and
narrow by faith in Jesus Christ, His Works for us and
His Word; doing all we do in this life for God’s glory
since we are appointed as ambassadors for Christ in
the midst of a crooked and perverse generation; and
arriving Home to be with Him forever and ever. This is
progressive, improving, onwards and upwards:
“Forgetting what lies behind and straining forward to
what lies ahead, I press on toward the goal for the prize
of the upward call of God in Christ Jesus,” (Philippians
3:13-14, RSV). We know we have total victory,
because we’ve had a sneak peek at the end of the
Book, and the vanquishing of the foes and the victory
celebrations are even better than we imagined! We are
emboldened to have a go, even when we feel far from
qualified or up to the task, because our Commander in
Chief says, “My grace is sufficient for you, for My
power is made perfect in weakness,” (II Corinthians
12:9, RSV). We are not afraid to make mistakes
because He Who knows the hearts of men says we “are
not under law but under grace,” (Romans 6:14, RSV).
We do not make excuses that our puny efforts won’t
make any difference at all because the Judge of all the
Universe says, “In the Lord your labour is not in
vain,” (I Corinthians 15:58, RSV). ?

Note:

1. From the foreward of Otto Scott’s Great Christian
Revolution: How Christianity Transformed the World.
The Reformer Library. Windsor, New York 1995.

From Keystone Magazine

September 2007, Vol. XIII No. 5
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig@hef.org.nz

To order a subscription to Keystone Magazine do one of the following:

send email to sales@hef.org.nz with visa number

post cheque or visa number to PO Box 9064, Palmerston North, New Zealand

fax: 06 357-4389

phone: 06 357-4399

Trademe (fees added):  http://www.trademe.co.nz/Members/Listings.aspx?member=2366144

Sella (No added fees):  http://www.sella.co.nz/store/4ym9qg/home-education-foundation/display-100

Feminist Dogma Debunked

Feminist Dogma Debunked

by Craig Smith
L-R: Craig and Barbara Smith, Kaitlyn 6, Charmagne 20, Zach 25,
Jeremiah 15, Alanson 23, Jedediah 9 and Genevieve 27. Absent: Grace 2
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
For years elite opinion has maintained that women are
happier in marriages that represent a union of equals and
where spouses share identical responsibilities in the
workplace and at home. Even as very few couples actually
live this way, a study by two noted University of Virginia
sociologists debunks the feminist spin, finding that women
— even those who espouse egalitarian ideals — are far happier
in marriages that have a traditional division of labor.
Looking at a subsample of 5,000 couples drawn from
the second wave (1992-94) of the National Survey of
Families and Households, Bradford Wilcox and Steven
Nock measured women’s marital happiness, women’s
satisfaction with the emotional attention they receive
from their husbands and the time husbands spend with
their wives against a number of independent variables
associated with various theories of marriage.
Their findings reveal that women are happiest when
they tend to hearth and home and their husbands bring
home the bacon (earning at least 68 percent of family
income). This did not surprise the researchers because
they also found that men who were married to
homemakers are more likely to spend “quality time”
with their wives. These traditional wives also
expressed greater satisfaction with their husbands’
emotional interaction with them.
In contrast, women who aspire to having “companionate”
marriages, thinking “equality” will deliver what they really
desire — the emotional engagement of their husbands —
actually end up spending less time with husbands than
their traditional peers. And these wives are less satisfied
with the understanding they receive from their husbands.
Also contributing to women’s marital happiness is a
dynamic generally missing from egalitarian marriages:
a shared commitment to marriage as a social and
normative institution, where each spouse views
matrimony as a binding commitment that “should never
be ended except under extreme circumstances.” Wives
also reported higher satisfaction with their husbands’
affection and understanding when couples share high
levels of church attendance.1
As we have traveled from Cape Reinga to Bluff (and
fairly large swaths of the USA) over the past 20 years,
talking to hundreds of home educating families as well
as local, state and national home education support
group leaders, a couple of things have become clear: if
dad is alive but not involved, mum is working against
major obstacles. Everything becomes more difficult:
not just the home education endeavours but also the
discipline of the children, getting their cooperation,
maintaining motivation or momentum or consistent
standards, etc. And when dad becomes involved,
exerting his authority (using effective methods, not just
a loud voice and intimidation) as head of the
household, there is an immediate increase in
orderliness and cooperation. And when mum and dad
are both committed to the same vision of training,
educating and discipling their children, working as a
unified team on the same projects, their effectiveness
increases again.
After 28 years of marriage, Barbara and I can say
without a shadow of doubt that it is the commitment to
each other and the children…and the massive amounts
of selfless work which that entails…every bit of it
made possible by the grace of God, that has given us
all more strength of character and satisfaction of life. I
met a heart-breaking loser on our honeymoon, an
emergency dentist in Sydney who was getting married
the next day. When she heard I was on my honeymoon,
she downed tools, pulled up a stool and asked if I ever
had any second thoughts about the marriage. “No
way!” I said. She said she and the boyfriend had been
living together for three years and had decided their
marriage would be based on the understanding that, if
at anytime in the future, one or the other decided –
unilaterally – that the spouse was restricting his or her
character development, the restricted one was free to
leave. I confess that, mindful that she was about to drill
my teeth, I choked back what I really wanted to say
and should have said: that if they wanted to see real
character development they’d commit to each other “til
death do us part.” We all understand that trials and
hardships build character, though we all also
understandably avoid unnecessary trials and hardships.
Great things are achieved through personal and family
disciplines. The Scriptures have been teaching these
things for millennia: “Count it all joy, my brethren,
when you meet various trials, for you know that the
testing of your faith produces steadfastness. And let
steadfastness have its full effect, that you may be
perfect and complete, lacking in nothing,” (James 1:2-
4, RSV. See also Romans 5:3-5 & Hebrews 12:3-11).
The effectiveness of every family member being
committed to the same vision can be enhanced by not
letting “good” things stop you from getting your teeth
into the “best” things. Barbara was plowing untold
efforts into the local home education support group.
This is good. Very good. I was giving my all to the
Home Education Foundation. This is also good. Our
daughter Genevieve, having been home educated, was
pursuing a legal career and the big OE. I remember
thinking that the Feminists and other critics could only
have a go at our Christian faith, but not at our division
of labour and individual pursuits and the fact that I –
the head of the household – wasn’t telling them what to
do. A fascinating series of events caused Barbara and
Genevieve to see that their efforts and mine could be
multiplied if we joined forces. Our second daughter
Charmagne was even quicker to jump in and commit
herself to the “Smith Family Corporation” which
includes our calling for each of us to be full time
working for the Home Education Foundation.
Being thick as a brick, I was the last one to see it. I
partly didn’t want to see it. It came into our
conscienceness somewhere along the line that when
Barbara and Genevieve and Charmagne brought their
efforts back home to make them completely available
to what I had been called to do, that we were starting to
match up with the Biblical model of wives being
subject to their husbands (and by implication, to their
husbands’ calling); children obey your parents (and by
implication, their parents’ calling); and husbands, as
head of the wife, love her as Christ loves the Church
and train up the children in the nurture and admonition
of the Lord. Our Lord does not leave us to our own
devices: He gives us the Scriptures and expects us to
do as it says. To love my wife and train my daughters
means in part to give them the directions of how to be
my help-meet and help-meets in training. I had
swallowed feminist poison for so long that it took ages
to see that encouraging my family members to get out
there and “do your own thing” was neglecting my
responsibility to shepherd them, especially when it was
so easy to get them involved in my calling. Since then
I’ve been trying to take up my responsibility as head to
lead, to provide the guidance and direction required for
three full-time workers apart from myself. It is hard
work: neither my mind nor my shoulders are used to
the increased load, and I am still affected by the
feminist poison I’ve ingested for so long. But the
increased cooperation and effectiveness have been
remarkable. And the unity of vision makes not only the
future but each new day exciting…we enjoy getting
out of bed and tackling each and every day, difficulties,
unpleasant duties, challenges and all.
The extra load feels right. I like the idea that I’ve
relieved my wife and daughters from stresses and
responsibilities they don’t need to carry. More things
seem possible now, for I know I can count on this
massive backing of three of the most profoundly
capable and committed people I know: my wife and
daughters. (And the one adult son in NZ comes home
from the RNZAF most weekends to help out as well!)
I tell you: this home education movement is the
greatest thing in over 100 years at least. The acid is
decidedly not on the children…it is on us parents. We
are forced to get our act together, a very painful but a
very good thing. It is also the best self-improvement
programme you will ever enroll in. Not only does the
acid burn away the junk, you are way outside the box
as a home educator, if not exactly shunned by others
then at least treated to the raised eyebrows and the
pursed lips. But once outside the box, and once you
learn to ignore the negativity of others, you start
looking at other cultural “sacred cows” and are just not
as likely any more to swallow what the feminists and
homosexuals and Marxists and media moguls and other
assorted special interest groups tell you. Indeed, we’ve
started believing what we’ve confessed for years —
that the Bible is our faithful guide through life — by
actually doing what it says and conforming to the
patterns of what it says are the norms. We love it! ?
Notes:
1.W. Bradford Wilcox and Steven L. Nock, “What’s Love Got to Do
With It? Equality, Equity, Commitment, and Women’s Marital
Equality,” Social Forces 84, (March 2006), as quoted in The
Howard Center for Family, Religion and Society, World
Congress of Families: Family Update Online, Vol. 8, Issue 1, 2
Jan 07.

From Keystone Magazine

September 2007, Vol. XIII No. 5
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig@hef.org.nz

To order a subscription to Keystone Magazine do one of the following:

send email to sales@hef.org.nz with visa number

post cheque or visa number to PO Box 9064, Palmerston North, New Zealand

fax: 06 357-4389

phone: 06 357-4399

Trademe (fees added):  http://www.trademe.co.nz/Members/Listings.aspx?member=2366144

Sella (No added fees):  http://www.sella.co.nz/store/4ym9qg/home-education-foundation/display-100

A War Going On

A War Going On

by Craig Smith
Last year sometime the NZ Race Relations
Commissioner (did you know we had one? His name is
Joris De Bres) called for submissions on a Draft
National Statement on Religious Diversity. This
statement was endorsed by the National Interfaith
Forum in Hamilton in February 2007. (Have you even
heard of such an event? It is an annual event.) The
Statement on Religious Diversity made a more
publicized appearance at the Asia-Pacific Interfaith
Dialogue held at Waitangi on 29 May 2007 when our
Prime Minister addressed the Forum by saying in part,
“My government works hard to ensure that all
ethnicities and faiths are valued and included in 21st
century New Zealand,” while Brian Tamaki of Destiny
Church introduced his own Statement on New
Zealand’s Religious Identity, the Waitangi Declaration,
which opened with the words, “We formally recognize
New Zealand as a Christian nation.”
In the NZ Census of 2006, 51% said they were
Christian, 32% said they were of no religion, 13% did
not say what they were, and all the other religious of
the world only added up to 5%. And yet the
Government spends our tax dollars through the Human
Rights Commission (HCR) to focus on ways they can
manipulate the 51% majority into thinking they should
accommodate that 5% minority. Here’s how:
“The Human Rights Commission facilitates the New
Zealand Diversity Action Programme which includes a
national interfaith network and a range of government
and community interfaith projects (www.hrc.co.nz/diversity).
There is a national interfaith website
(www.interfaith.org.nz), a network of regional interfaith
councils and a number of national councils such as the
Council of Christians and Jews and the Council of
Christians and Muslims. There is an annual National
Interfaith Forum in February and a National Religious
Diversity Forum at the [annual] New Zealand Diversity
Forum in August… The 2006 forum [in Wellington]
was attended by faith community representatives and
members, government ministers, key government
department chief executives and local government
representatives. The forum addressed three issues:
government and faith community cooperation,
education and the development of a statement on
religious diversity.”1
There is clearly something cooking here. You cannot
even get to the interfaith.org.nz home page unless you
are authorised. And as you explore the Human Rights
Commission’s website pages on religious Diversity
(two good starting places are: http://tinyurl.
find that these initiatives to bring religious
communities together and foment harmony and
tolerance come for the most part from the central
Government rather than from Christian churches. Even
more worrying is the official commentary of the last of
the eight points in the New Zealand Statement of
Religious Diversity that was presented at the Asia-
Pacific Interfaith Dialogue in Waitangi:
“8. Cooperation and Understanding. Government
and faith communities have a responsibility to build
and maintain positive relationships with each other,
and to promote mutual respect and understanding. The
right to religion, like all rights, entails responsibilities.
This statement delineates the responsibilities of faith
communities in relation to government and other faith
communities. These responsibilities include fostering
relationships with other religious communities that
promote not just tolerance but understanding, respect
and cooperation. Likewise government, both local and
national, has a parallel responsibility to seek to develop
and sustain good relationships with religious
communities in New Zealand.”This represents the quiet
approach of the enemy to undermine and subvert the
robust and victorious nature of Christ’s Church here on
earth. It is often hard even to recognise this stuff as
subversive, but it clearly is. It starts off by saying, “The
right to religion, like all rights, entails responsibilities.”
Since when does anyone need the central government in
Wellington to affirm that we have a right to religion? Does
Parliament tell Christians what our religious
responsibilities are? The government’s approach to
this, you see, is that they are the dispenser of rights, a
position they took up in 1990 with the NZ Bill of
Rights Act and re-emphasised with the Human Rights
Act of 1993: as far as the state is concerned, rights are
bestowed upon the populace (and revoked) by a simple
majority vote in Parliament. In addition, this
government statement wants Christians to respect,
understand and cooperate with those religions which,
sadly, blind people to the truth of their need of
redemption through Christ. It says we have a
responsibility to do so. (Will this be backed up in law
one day if we don’t?) We Christians as individuals
should always treat other people, even in-your-face
reprobates, as image-bearers of God and with all due
respect. But we do not treat false religions as anything
other than a blindness that leads to hell. In addition,
our Lord makes some fairly exclusive comments in the
Scriptures such as, “He who is not for Me is against
Me; he who does not gather with Me scatters,” (Luke
11:23); “All authority in heaven and on earth has been
given to Me. Go therefore and make disciples of all
nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and
of the Son and of the Holy Spirit, teaching them to
observe all that I have commanded you,” (Matthew
28:18-20); “He who believes in the Son has eternal
life; he who does not obey the Son shall not see life,
but the wrath of God rests upon him,” (John 3:36); “I
am the way, the truth and the life; no one comes to the
Father but by Me,” (John 14:6). It is our privilege to
show respect and understanding to the lost, pointing
out that they are lost due to their false religions.
Another approach of the enemy is the aggressive
attack. This is easier to recognise and oppose.
Elizabeth McKenzie, President of the NZ Association
of Rationalists and Humanists, wrote a submission on
15 December 2006 addressing this Statement on
Religious Diversity in which she commented directly
on this point number eight by saying, “I think that
homogenising the population by removing separate
religious schools and the option of home schooling for
the religious would go further in reaching this goal
than a Statement on Religious Diversity.”
Elizabeth sure recognizes where the battlefield lies: in
the hearts and minds of the children, the next
generation. Her answer is to get religion out of
education, including home education, and presumably
let the state and rationalists and humanists continue to
do it in the school institutions and in the home. I
submit to you that she says such an approach would
homogenise the population (make us all the same as
her) since state education is coming from the same
stable as her favourite horses of rationalism and
humanism.
Folks, there is a war going on. We must not go into
denial and decide to ignore it and just enjoy the good
life, for then we and our children will become
casualties. This war started at least as far back as the
Garden of Eden. There are only two sides to this war.
And the war will go on until one side wins.
Now, we already know Who wins, and in fact, He has
already won the war at the Cross of Calvary. We are all
now engaged in mopping up exercises, offering terms
of peace, the Gospel of Jesus Christ, to those rebels
who still sniper at us Christians. When our Commander
in Chief comes on Judgment Day, He will show no
mercy to these rebels…as ambassadors of Christ we do
what we can to show them the need to surrender to
Christ, repent, lay down their arms and take up the
Sword of the Spirit, the Word of God and the other
parts of the Christian Soldier’s armour and fight with
us.
Sure, we appear to be outnumbered at present and
losing the battle. That may be, but it is only a
temporary situation. There were only 120 in the upper
room on the Day of Pentecost, but more than 3,000 by
the end of the day. Since then, Christianity globally has
only grown, though there have been localized setbacks.
These phony peace initiatives wrapped in phony
religious garments such as this “National Statement on
Religious Diversity” is designed to neutralise, to
castrate the potency of fully-Biblical, Christ-centred
Christian Faith. We must not have a bar of it.
But we must understand our situation in New Zealand:
three times recently the MPs voted against the wishes
of the overwhelming numbers of voters: in
decriminalizing prostitution, establishing civil unions
and criminalizing parents who correct their children.
We must understand that what used to be underground
(homosexuality and prostitution) is now paraded in the
streets; and what once was talked of openly on the
streets (that children need to be smacked and that
homosexuality is a perversion) is now being driven
underground.
Let me quote from R.J. Rushdoony’s Institutes of
Biblical Law, page 164: “In the Marxist scheme, the
transfer of authority from the family to the state makes
any talk of the family as an institution ridiculous. The
family is to all practical intent abolished whenever the
state determines the education, vocation, religion and
the discipline of the child.” Have we not seen most if
not all of these things right here in NZ of late? And NZ
has added a Families Commission to further destroy
and marginalise and render irrelevant the Biblical norm
of family being husband and wife joined in holy
matrimony under God with the children God gives
them.
Christianity, Biblical Law, the Christian Faith applied
to all of life and individual consistent Christians are all
under attack here in NZ. Those who do not recognise
that a war is on and who fail to take up arms will suffer
the obvious consequences.
Notes:
1. Building Bridges: The Third Asia Pacific Regional Interfaith Dialogue
Waitangi, New Zealand, May 29-31, 2007 at http://tinyurl.com/23zu3z.


From Keystone Magazine

July 2007, Vol. XIII No. 4
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig@hef.org.nz

To order a subscription to Keystone Magazine do one of the following:

send email to sales@hef.org.nz with visa number

post cheque or visa number to PO Box 9064, Palmerston North, New Zealand

fax: 06 357-4389

phone: 06 357-4399

Trademe (fees added):  http://www.trademe.co.nz/Members/Listings.aspx?member=2366144

Sella (No added fees):  http://www.sella.co.nz/store/4ym9qg/home-education-foundation/display-100

Teaching Little Children Sign Language by Charmagne Smith

Teaching Little Children Sign Language

It all started when I read somewhere that children can learn to sign before they can even speak.

“Hungry”

I am a very hands-on person, and speaking with your hands really appealed to me. So, I enrolled in a New Zealand Sign Language (NZSL) class at a local night school. Between the classes I would teach various signs I had learnt to my younger siblings (then aged 5 and 8). We had a lot of fun making up our own personal sign names, asking family members what they would like to drink, and finger spelling words.“Cold”. This is a shivering action.

Grace Ariana, our family’s youngest was 5 months old when I started regularly using some signs. When she was about 9 months she began (with much encouragement and help) to make a few signs herself. Her first sign was “Hello”, followed by a simplified version of “Please”, and a bit later she also started signing “Down”, “Food”, “Thirsty” and eventually “Bath”, and “More”.

“Thirsty”. She breathes in and out loudly through

pursed lips while she points to her mouth.

However, she was just learning to co-ordinate her hands and there were a few words that she simply couldn’t sign correctly. She got around this by making up her own version of the sign!  Sometimes these adjusted signs were very recognisable, other times Grace’s first attempts at more complicated signs needed quite a bit of deciphering! For example: A little while before Grace turned 12 months, she started occasionally shaking her fist in the air at us. For a few days I didn’t know why she was doing this, and I couldn’t figure out what she was trying to say. After a while though, I realised I had recently started signing “good night” as I said it whenever she went for a sleep – and it was about then she started to mysteriously shake her fist at me! She was just making up her own simplified version of the sign!

“Toilet” As Gracie is being potty-trained, this gets
instant action. We whip her to the nearest potty
pronto! She knows that if she uses this sign and
also produces, she will be rewarded with a
chocolate button.

For a long time Grace’s favourite sign was “Where”. Using this sign, we could spend hours playing a form of hide and seek with her. She would hide a toy behind a pillow or under a chair, then turn to us and ask “Where?” This game came to a climax in January as we were crossing the Cook Strait in the Ferry. Grace was being carried around on deck and as they were standing by the edge railing, Grace suddenly threw her bottle over the side of the ferry. She then turned signing “Where?”

Where is the Weka? Gracie had been having such fun

chasing this weka around. It was a classic comedy

moment when she lost sight of it, asked us “Where” it was

and turned to discover it right behind her!

A recent addition to Gracie’s signing vocabulary is the word “Sorry”. It’s amazing how pleasing this little sign can be after she has discovered she can reach the flour, or has drawn on someone’s special notebook instead of the colouring book!

“More” She does this sign when she wants more of

the same whether it be food, games, fun or books.

There are some signs that I use quite often with the older children, which Grace has not yet tried to use, things like “Sit up”, “Stop talking”, numbers and letters, etc. Others words like “Ice Cream” and “Milo” she has now learnt to say and I’m not sure that she will learn the sign.“Please?” How can we refuse?

We’ve all heard the big question from homeschool sceptics: “What about socialisation?” Well those who are sceptical about signing with babies have a big question too. But don’t let it put you off, for it is as unfounded and easily rebuffed as the infamous Socialisation Question. Basically this is how it goes: “Won’t signing delay the child’s speech?”

The short answer is “Of course not!” but that will probably not satisfy well-meaning relatives, so here is some of what an experienced signing mother, Monica Beyer, has to say about dealing with criticism.

“[One] way to deal with criticism is smile politely and ignore it. … If you feel someone could benefit from enlightenment, tell them what you’re hoping to accomplish with baby signing and encourage them to sign with your baby, too.”

A little further in the article is this Crawling vs. Signing analogy which is spot on!

Crawling

Signing

Precedes walking

Precedes talking

Helps a child get around who otherwise would be unable to

Helps a child communicate who otherwise would be unable to

Gradually disappears as child begins walking

Gradually disappears as child begins talking

Doesn’t prohibit a child from walking

Doesn’t prohibit a child from talking

Is not a crutch

Is not a crutch

Doesn’t cause children to think, “Hey, this is easier than walking, so I will choose to not walk!”

Doesn’t cause children to think, “Hey, this is easier than talking, so I will choose to not talk!”

And so on

And so forth!

~ Used with permission.

To see Monica’s article in full visit her website www.signingbaby.com and look on the “Speech Delay Myth?” page.

While you’re there, have a look around the site and you’ll find interesting articles, getting started guidelines, and a great photo dictionary full of babies and young children using basic American Sign Language!

There has been quite a bit of research on signing and speech delay. See the following websites for more information:

I could not find much information on teaching NZ Sign Language to babies. The best was www.baby-talk.co.nz. About 80% of their signs are identical to NZSL signs (some signs have been simplified) However, the website doesn’t give out much information for free, so unless your local library has a copy of their book Baby Sign Language, (or you buy a copy for yourself) you may find other sites more helpful.

So… Whether it is ASL or NZSL being used (or a group of signs made up between parent and child), the fun, the smiles, the admiration, the surprises, the all-round benefits that come from being able to communicate with even very young children make it well worth the effort of including some sign language into your everyday life with your baby.

“Quiet”

Gracie learned this one when we read her Goodnight Moon. It

was a book she requested multiple times during the day. She would

do this sign whenever we got to the line, “Goodnight to the old lady

whispering hush.” It has become a handy sign that we do with her

during family devotions, when the phone rings or at church.

Here she wants us to be quiet so we don’t scare the worms away.

From Keystone Magazine

May 2007, Vol. XIII No. 3
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig@hef.org.nz

To order a subscription to Keystone Magazine do one of the following:

send email to sales@hef.org.nz with visa number

post cheque or visa number to PO Box 9064, Palmerston North, New Zealand

fax: 06 357-4389

phone: 06 357-4399

Trademe (fees added):  http://www.trademe.co.nz/Members/Listings.aspx?member=2366144

Sella (No added fees):  http://www.sella.co.nz/store/4ym9qg/home-education-foundation/display-100

“How Did You Stick At It?”

“How Did You Stick At It?”

We were convinced about home education from
Scripture and the nature of the state schools. We stuck
to it as pioneers by faith. Today we are thrilled with the
results. More than that, we can see how much more
effective we could have been if we had not had the
negative responses, the doubt, the insecurity, the lack
of support and the lack of vision. All of these things
have today been rectified.
II Corinthians 3:18 is one of those key passages that
guide my entire outlook on life. It says (in my beloved
RSV): “And we all, with unveiled face, beholding the
glory of the Lord, are being changed into His likeness
from one degree of glory to another; for this comes
from the Lord Who is the Spirit.” This says change is
part of the Christian’s life. But not just change for the
sake of change. No, the change is specific and
directional: into the likeness of Jesus Christ and from
one degree of glory to another. To me that clearly
communicates that it is an uphill climb in which I am
to be engaged for the rest of my life. I don’t like the
idea of slogging uphill all my days,
but that is clearly what this is telling
me is a normal part of Christian life.
It is not an isolated idea, by the way:
it is all though Scripture. The Ten
Commandments of Exodus 20 call us
to certain standards which the Lord
Jesus explained in the Sermon on the
Mount (Matthew 5) were actually far
more stringent than most ever
thought, saying we must hunger and
thirst for righteousness, not assume
that He came to abolish the Law,
have a righteousness that exceeds the
Pharisees, be perfect as our heavenly
Father is perfect. Deuteronomy 6:5
says we are to love God with
everything we’ve got, just as our
Lord Jesus also said. Paul writes in
Philippians 3:12-16 to forget the past
while maintaining the standards
gained in the past and press onwards
and upwards to the prize.
In addition Romans 5:17 (RSV) says,
“If, because of one man’s trespass,
death reigned through that one man,
much more will those who receive
the abundance of grace and the free
gift of righteousness reign in life
through the one man Jesus Christ.” Death reigns
on earth at the rate of nearly 100%: I
suppose Enoch did not see death nor did the
prophet Elijah, nor will those left alive when the
Lord returns to wrap up the whole show on
judgement day. But we who received grace and
righteousness (a gift, note, not one we earned by
our good works which the verses in the previous
paragraph and James 2:14-26 and others say we
must still perform); we who are born again
Christians should reign in life more, much more,
than death reigns! But we reign in this life through
Jesus Christ. We reign in life! We don’t just get by; we
don’t just survive; we don’t just struggle through each
month financially and emotionally, wondering what the
purpose of it all is…we REIGN in life!!! We’re on the
top, not the bottom; we’re the head and not the tail; we
are as the wealthiest yet possessing little of this world’s
goods…because we reign through Jesus Christ.
OK, so how do we do that? Colossians 3:1-3: “If then
you have been raised with Christ, seek the things that
are above, where Christ is, seated at the right hand of
God. Set your minds on things that are above, not on
things that are on earth. For you have died, and your
life is hid with Christ in God.” Romans 8 talks about
how we can now fulfil the just requirement of the Law
by walking according to the Spirit, setting our minds
on the things of the Spirit, not on things of the flesh.
Galatians 2:20 is probably the clearest: “I have been
crucified with Christ. It is no longer I who live, but
Christ who lives in me. And the life I now live in the
flesh I live by faith in the Son of God who loved me
and gave Himself for me.” Jesus is to continue to live
on this earth vicariously as it were though us. We get
the blessings of an orderly, obedient, peaceful and
purposeful life. And we get persecutions…if we do the
same work as He did on this earth, we need to expect
all the same working conditions as He endured. This
really is what we are all called to do anyway. Luke
9:23-24: “If any man would come after Me, let him
deny himself and take up his cross daily and follow
Me. For whoever would save his life will lose it; and
whoever loses his life for My sake, he will save it.”
Our whole lives are to be given over to Him that we
may be used as instruments of righteousness in His
hands.
Home education is for us foundational in
accomplishing this kind of life to which we are called.
It is fulfilling one of the first, most primary callings we
have as humans, and even more so as parents: to tell
His praises to others, to inculcate His word into the
next generation, to evangelise and disciple the lost, to
train up our children to live for Him only as totally
committed soldiers of the cross. When I look to the
Scriptures about doing this, I see a very full
curriculum, one that includes the three Rs, all the hard
sciences, exceptional communication, language,
negotiation, mediation and teaching skills all to a high
standard of excellence in the three passages of Genesis
1:28, Matthew 28:18-20 and II Corinthians 5:17-20. In
doing these things we have found we are living, not for
ourselves, but for the glory of God, through Jesus
Christ…the purpose of living, of parenting, of home
educating is to see Christ live through us and
through our children, to see His Word living
and active and motivating and directing our
thoughts, words and deeds and those of our
children. Being focussed on our children has
FORCED us to get our own personal acts
together as committed followers of Jesus
Christ, and suddenly all the traditional goals
of Western life: to gain a bigger house,
flasher car, more paid holidays, a more
prestigious career, comfort, ease and
pleasure…none of these things appear on the
radar screen anymore. But we couldn’t be
more happy or fulfilled or excited about the
present as well as about the future. This is
how we stick at it…because we love it with a
passion!
But wait…there’s more! We Christian home
educators love children so much, many of us
have more than the bare replacement of 2.1
children per woman. Europe is dying: look at
what used to be the bastions of Roman
Catholicism which encourages large
families: Italy now has a birth rate of 1.2 per
woman; Spain’s is a mere 1.15. Of the 10
lowest birth rates in the world, 9 are in
Europe: the 10th is Japan. In addition,
unbelievers are increasing the slaughter of
their children who are conceived and also
engaging in lifestyles that ensure an increase
in infertility and early deaths. If we keep
having large families of 4, 5 & 6, just give us
a couple of generations and we’ll take over
by force of numbers! And then factor in the
advantages of strong family background, excellence in
education because of our desire to do all things well
and God’s favour upon His elect, and I see a bright
future indeed for our posterity…as long as we can
effectively communicate the vision to the third and
fourth generation so that they’ll do the same.
Everything about the state schooling system is so far
from any of this that it is simply irrelevant at best and
at worst is a mix of hostile philosophies and practises
designed to keep Christians lost in the woods of sinful
secularism and worldliness. Once we shed any desire
to be blessed by the MoE or ERO, to be approved by
them more than is legally required, to stay abreast of
their schooling system, to receive resources or advice
from them…once we became more or less one-eyed
about living for Christ alone, we lost a huge load of
useless baggage that clung pretty tightly. As a
consequence we became so much more free and
unencumbered to home educate (that is, live for
Christ). We have been freed to love and indulge our
passion for seeing Christ live in and through ourselves
and our children even more!
We are seeing the fulfilment of Psalm 37:4: “Take
delight in the Lord and He will give you the desires of
your heart.” When the desires of our hearts start to
parallel His desires (as opposed to our own or those of
the state schooling system), then He obviously delights
to give us those desires!!

From Keystone Magazine

March 2007, Vol. XIII No. 2
P O Box 9064
Palmerston North
Phone: (06) 357-4399
Fax: (06) 357-4389
email: craig@hef.org.nz

To order a subscription to Keystone Magazine do one of the following:

send email to sales@hef.org.nz with visa number

post cheque or visa number to PO Box 9064, Palmerston North, New Zealand

fax: 06 357-4389

phone: 06 357-4399

Trademe (fees added):  http://www.trademe.co.nz/Members/Listings.aspx?member=2366144

Sella (No added fees):  http://www.sella.co.nz/store/4ym9qg/home-education-foundation/display-100