Is any reading good reading? Or is it dumbing down the student?

Is any reading good reading?

BOOKWORM: Teachers are using different reading materials to encourage young people to read.

BOOKWORM: Teachers are using different reading materials to encourage young people to read.

Here’s some news that will ease the minds of parents of even the most reluctant readers.

If your child refuses to pick up a book, don’t despair. Teachers and parents are increasingly using comic books, magazines, TV, websites and even video games and text messages to nurture a love of words in children.

The message is simple: any reading is good reading, said Kathy Ferrari, a primary school teacher and North Sydney branch president of the Australian Literacy Educators’ Association.

“I very much believe that a wide range of material is best and anything that gets kids reading is fantastic,” she said.

Comic books and their sophisticated cousin, graphic novels, are now regularly being deployed in classrooms. No longer seen as shallow, they are valued as a way to engage children and teach another form of visual literacy. They are also an introduction to the classics, with many great works of literature, including those by Shakespeare, now published as comics.

“It’s wonderful to do one in a classroom, to do the comparisons of the way different texts are published,” Ferrari said.

She also embraces magazines as a great tool, with their variety of topics and mix of fiction and non-fiction, images and words. “I would never recommend a sole diet of that but if that’s all they are reading, it’s better than nothing.”

Karen Brooks, an author and associate professor of media studies at Southern Cross University, said the rapid spread of technology should not be seen as the enemy of literacy.

“It [technology] is a gift,” she said. “Never before have we had so much at our fingertips to both educate and challenge our difficult readers but also our more sophisticated readers.”

The problem is those reluctant readers. Just as there will always be children who devour Austen and Tolkien from an early age, there will always be a group who struggle with books, and they are predominantly young boys.

Literacy testing reveals the divide. A University of Canberra report, Boys, Blokes and Books, cites 2009 NAPLAN results: 89.6 per cent of year 5 boys performed at or above the national minimum standard compared with 93.9 per cent of girls at the same age. In year 7, the gap between girls and boys was 6.4 per cent.

One issue is the relevance of classroom texts for boys who prefer biographies to fiction, fantasy to poetry.

For their paper What Do Australian Boys Think About Reading?, University of Sydney researchers Maxine Broughton and Jacqueline Manuel interviewed 30 boys from a NSW high school. They found teachers failed to engage the students by not basing reading on the boys’ preferred topics and genres.

Brooks says this is where technology comes in. Non-readers might start with text messages to familiarise themselves with the written word, read websites about their favourite TV shows or write a short review of a video game.

“It forms a bridge and it allows them to cross that bridge,” she said. “As they learn the wonder and the surprises and joys of words, then you transition them into books.”

Leonie Tyle is exploring the potential of e-readers, such as the iPad, after 25 years as a librarian and children’s publisher. She says e-books up the interactive factor, with moving and talking characters, while still offering the crucial parent-child experience. They can also be used by students to share thoughts on books with real classmates, or virtual ones further afield.

“I think this generation is so attuned to games, television, computers, social networking … kids who aren’t readers are more likely to pick up an e-reader and read a book,” Tyle said.

Interactive Press, which has published nearly 100 titles digitally, will soon release About Face, a book by Adelaide author Robert Moore. Conceived about 25 years ago, the story about a child who dreams his facial features run away from his face failed initially to win publishers’ favour. But Moore teamed up with Adelaide animation studio Monkeystack, and About Face is now due to be published, accompanied by iPad and iPhone applications.

“Maybe I had to bide my time. All of this [technology] is out there happening … and we can’t resist it,” Moore said.

– Sydney Morning Herald

http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/wellbeing/4595708/Is-any-reading-good-reading

Heavy defeat for new smacking bill

Heavy defeat for new smacking bill

NZPA September 9, 2010, 6:23 am

ACT MP David Garrett

A bill that would have effectively repealed the anti-smacking law by again allowing parents to use “reasonable force” to discipline their children was defeated in Parliament last night by 115 votes to five.

The member’s bill was sponsored by ACT MP David Garrett, who said that although police had discretion over prosecuting for a light smack, it was still an offence in law and had to be removed from the statutes.

“The law has turned good parents into criminals, in the same category as those who bash and kill their children,” he said.

Mr Garrett said the law hadn’t worked anyway because since the legislation was passed 20 children had been murdered and notifications of child abuse had increased.

Labour’s deputy leader Annette King said the law was passed by a majority of MPs after a compromise was reached between then prime minister Helen Clark and John Key when he was Leader of the Opposition.

“This is a political bill, we have all moved on and it should be removed from the House as soon as possible”, Ms King said.

National’s Hekia Parata said the anti-smacking law was working, and a review had shown that.

“I’m personally applaud the fact that we are opposing it,” she said.

Green Party co-leader Metiria Turei said the bill was a waste of Parliament’s time.

“It seeks to injure children. Wouldn’t we do better by finding ways to build safe, warm homes for them,” she said.

ACT MP John Boscawen drafted the bill but couldn’t sponsor it because he became a minister last month.

He said current law created confusion because of police discretion and a referendum had shown 87 percent of voters wanted it changed.

“This bill stands up for the rights of those people,” he said.

Maori Party MP Te Ururoa Flavell said punitive approaches to discipline were wrong and the law didn’t criminalise parents.

“The law is working well, parents are prevented from using the defence of reasonable force and we reject this bill absolutely,” he said.

ACT’s five MPs were the only ones who voted for the bill.

Family First NZ Media Release 8 Sep 2010
Family First NZ is calling on politicians to respect democracy and the voice of NZ’ers expressed in the recent Referendum and support the bill being introduced tonight in parliament to decriminalise light smacking. READ MORE



Family First Comment:
This is an incredible result and, although not a scientific independent poll, it still gives you an indication that this fight isn’t anywhere near over!

Got a comment on this issue? Email feedback@familyfirst.org.nz

“Talk back” about Home Education on Radio Rhema 10:00am Friday 28 May 2010

“Talk back” about

Home Education/State Schooling/Christian Private Schooling

on Radio Rhema 10:00am Friday 28 May 2010

Home Education was the the topic of discussion along with State and Christian Private schooling

at 10:00am Thursday morning

This is being followed up with perhaps a few more interviews and then an “open talk back” time. I think this is between 10:ooam and 11:00am. Would be great to get a number of home educators calling in during this time. I am sure that as you listen to the programme they will give out the phone number to ring.

Suzanne was a great ambassador for Home Educators in the programme today – Thursday 27 May 2010:

Talk @ Ten, Educational Choices – Feature Audio, listen below for Thursday’s programme
Many parents agonise over the educational choices they need to make for their children. Which type of education is best? Today we look at three options – state schools, Christian schools and home schooling.

State Schooling

Christian Private Schooling

Home Education

To listen in on Friday’s programme use one of the following:

Listen here online:  http://www.rhema.co.nz/images/stories/articlepics/radio.html

Listen here on the Radio:

Frequencies at 01 May 2010.
* Stations marked with an asterisk are not part of RBG – they re-broadcast our programmes with our permission; they are low power stations and therefore do not give full coverage of an area.
Frequency Finder website – http://frequencyfinder.co.nz/
Between now and 2011, some of our frequencies will be moving to comply with Government broadcasting regulations. While the changes are slight, it’s important to us that you can hear us loud and clear!  We’ll do our best to keep this map updated regularly but if you are having trouble tuning in visit the Frequency Finder website for the latest changes as they happen.

Home schooling viable alternative says researcher

ROACHE-LEO.jpg

Kathleen Vossler, Leo Roache and Tim Burgess reminisce over an old class photo.

Home schooling viable alternative says researcher

burgess-tim_roache-leo_vossler-kathleen.jpgDr Leo Roache celebrates his graduation as
Doctor of Education with two of the College
of Education’s senior staff and his former
school pupils, Dr Tim Burgess and
Dr Kathleen Vossler.

Home schooling is a viable alternative to the state school’s approach to education, says veteran teacher, former principal and now Doctor of Education Leo Roache.

Dr Roache, from Palmerston North, who graduates today, interviewed a broad range of homeschooling families to find out why parents chose to home school and how they went about it. Where previous research revealed similarities in beliefs and practices, he found that each homeschooling family had unique reasons and methods.

These commonly included a wish to control the influences on their children’s learning, dissatisfaction with schools, religious beliefs, concerns about the influence of other children and desire to maintain a family culture. Teaching curricula, developed by parents, in consultation with their children, and based on their perceived needs and abilities, were in harmony with their reasons for choosing to homeschool, Dr Roache says.

“Some students just need stimulation and interesting ideas to challenge them. The new [2007] curriculum is a very good step towards allowing that and it’s about the best curriculum I’ve seen – even though I don’t believe it is necessary. It encourages kids to think, and teaches them to work independently. In the early curriculum, you simply didn’t do that.”

Dr Roache, 80, taught standard four (year six) at College Street School in Palmerston North in 1964 and recalls two of the “smart cookies” in his class, Kathleen Vossler (nee Cutler) and Tim Burgess, both of whom are also Doctors of Education as well as senior academic staff in the University’s College of Education.

Both Dr Vossler and Dr Burgess recall that year as something special – a time where they were engaged in investigating things that interested them, motivated to pursue understanding and knowledge. Dr Roache does not take credit for their success. “They did it, not me. Pupils make their own choices and learn for themselves. I just had to be there.”

He believes most children are capable, independent thinkers, and the best teachers are there to facilitate learning, not simply to make it happen. “I believe that all kids can think independently from a very young age, but our society discourages it. The rule was that the teacher told and the kids – apparently – learned. As a result, I always thought that curriculum was a waste of time. It was a prescribed framework that didn’t necessarily fit the kids who were supposed to be learning.”

As a teacher, Dr Roache had Massey staff come and give talks to his class on a range of topics and even took his pupils on field-trips to the University campus to see research and learning in action. “This was never mentioned or even thought of in the curriculum; we just did it. There was no restriction. When we went to the library the children just read.”

You can read the article here:

http://www.massey.ac.nz/massey/about-massey/news/article.cfm?mnarticle=home-schooling-viable-alternative-says-researcher-12-05-2010

Quarter of NCEA answers fail on re-mark

Quarter of NCEA answers fail on re-mark

Education minister Anne Tolley is demanding answers after new figures reveal almost a quarter of the marks given for internally assessed NCEA standards last year were incorrect.

Each year about 250,000 internally assessed standards – 10 percent of the total – are re-assessed by moderators hired by the Qualifications Authority (NZQA), who judge whether teachers are being too soft – or too hard – on their pupils.

This year, 24 percent of the re-marked standards had problems, meaning there was only a 76 percent “agreement rate” between teachers and moderators. The 60,000 dubious grades will not be changed and students affected will not be told.

The failure rate is only marginally better than for 2008, when a full 27.5 percent of re-marked work was found to be wrongly graded, a number that Tolley said then she was “extremely concerned” about.

Last week Tolley said she was disappointed there hadn’t been greater improvement in the 2009 agreement rates. “This is an issue which I’m focused on, and I’ve asked NZQA to explain why these results aren’t as good as they should be,” she said.

But NZQA said the apparent amount of mis-marked coursework was an overestimation, as many of the standards reassessed had been brought to the moderator’s attention by teachers who specifically wanted guidance on a close call between a pass or fail.

It is the latest controversy to dog the internally assessed National Certificate of Educational Achievement rolled out in 2004. The system breaks subjects down into a large number of “unit standards” and “achievement standards”, which are each worth a certain number of credits.

Students must collect a certain number of credits to pass each of the three NCEA levels – 80 credits are required for Level 1 – and their performance by the end of Level 3 determines which courses they can take if they go on to university.

A number of schools that believe NCEA is flawed now offer their students external assessment such as the Cambridge international exams, or the International Baccalaureate exams.

Over the years there have been concerns over inconsistent marking, and of NCEA standards that are considered too “easy”, potentially allowing students to achieve worthless qualifications.

NZQA deputy chief executive Bali Haque told the Sunday Star-Times that recent changes to the re-assessment process meant the 24 percent dubious marks was probably an overestimate, and next year’s figures were expected to be lower.

NZQA had also put in further professional support to help teachers with their internal assessments, especially when a student’s work was just on the boundary between a pass and a fail, or between a “merit” ranking and an “excellence”.

While details of the incorrect 2009 grades were not available, problems exposed during moderating of 2008 grades included teachers accepting “vague generalisations” and wrong answers “being ticked correct”.

Teachers were also found to be handing out test papers that were so detailed students “could essential copy answers”.

The details of mis-marked NCEA standards were released at the same time as the NCEA pass rates for every high school in the country. Pass rates for Year 11, 12 and 13 students sitting NCEA Levels 1, 2 and 3 have been posted on the NZQA website, and can be broken down by such criteria as the school, students’ ethnicity or the school decile rating.

By MICHELLE SUTTON – Sunday Star TimesThe full list of NCEA results

Read article here:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/3570411/Quarter-of-NCEA-answers-fail-on-re-mark